AJK unrest

Published
0

THERE is trouble brewing in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, where a coalition comprising various civil society organisations and backed by some political parties has been able to pull off another successful strike, this time against a controversial ordinance seeking to ‘regulate’ public gatherings. For context, last month, AJK President Barrister Sultan Mehmood had approved a presidential ordinance that imposed draconian punishments for ‘illegal’ public gatherings, rallies, and protests. It was similar to the law to regulate public assembly in Islamabad, issued by the federal government in September, called the Public Order and Peaceful Assembly Act of 2024. Under both laws, the administrative apparatus was given unprecedented powers to approve or deny permission to public gatherings and to impose severe punishments in case of non-compliance. Yesterday, the AJK public responded positively to the strike call despite an AJK supreme court injunction suspending the said ordinance two days earlier, ignoring the territorial government’s many exhortations for business to continue as usual.

It appears that the people of AJK feel quite strongly about measures taken to control their liberties, and the strike’s success suggests a bigger confrontation may be brewing. According to a strike organiser, “Our campaign is for the fundamental rights of the citizens of this state, which this law compromises. A peaceful strike will send a loud and clear message about the people’s commitment to civil liberties.” While the ordinance has been suspended, the coalition says it wants it repealed in full. It may be recalled that the same coalition, the Jammu & Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee, had also held large protests earlier this year, which ultimately forced the territorial government to accede to its demands. The trend is worrying, as it appears that attempts to exert control on the liberated territory have been triggering strong responses from the AJK public. Decision-makers would be well advised to proceed with caution, given the sensitivities involved, and to address local concerns with restraint.

Published in Dawn, December 6th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Maritime alliance
Updated 01 Aug, 2026

Maritime alliance

AS the US-Iran war drags on, new battle lines are being drawn. The pro-US Gulf Arab monarchies and Iran have enjoyed...
Local governance
01 Aug, 2026

Local governance

INTERIOR Minister Mohsin Naqvi’s speech at a business summit on Thursday has stirred a hornet’s nest. His...
Murders in Balochistan
01 Aug, 2026

Murders in Balochistan

GOOD news is scarce in Balochistan. Seven labourers were abducted and gunned down in Turbat city recently. Four...
Expanding conflict
31 Jul, 2026

Expanding conflict

WITH neither of the belligerents willing to back down, and the theatre of conflict expanding geographically, the...
Spoils and spats
31 Jul, 2026

Spoils and spats

A FIGHT over assembly seats in Azad Jammu and Kashmir has laid bare what seem to be some deep resentments between ...
Unfair tax system
31 Jul, 2026

Unfair tax system

THE disclosure that the FBR collected nearly Rs1.9tr in sales and income taxes through electricity bills over the...