AJK unrest

Published December 6, 2024

THERE is trouble brewing in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, where a coalition comprising various civil society organisations and backed by some political parties has been able to pull off another successful strike, this time against a controversial ordinance seeking to ‘regulate’ public gatherings. For context, last month, AJK President Barrister Sultan Mehmood had approved a presidential ordinance that imposed draconian punishments for ‘illegal’ public gatherings, rallies, and protests. It was similar to the law to regulate public assembly in Islamabad, issued by the federal government in September, called the Public Order and Peaceful Assembly Act of 2024. Under both laws, the administrative apparatus was given unprecedented powers to approve or deny permission to public gatherings and to impose severe punishments in case of non-compliance. Yesterday, the AJK public responded positively to the strike call despite an AJK supreme court injunction suspending the said ordinance two days earlier, ignoring the territorial government’s many exhortations for business to continue as usual.

It appears that the people of AJK feel quite strongly about measures taken to control their liberties, and the strike’s success suggests a bigger confrontation may be brewing. According to a strike organiser, “Our campaign is for the fundamental rights of the citizens of this state, which this law compromises. A peaceful strike will send a loud and clear message about the people’s commitment to civil liberties.” While the ordinance has been suspended, the coalition says it wants it repealed in full. It may be recalled that the same coalition, the Jammu & Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee, had also held large protests earlier this year, which ultimately forced the territorial government to accede to its demands. The trend is worrying, as it appears that attempts to exert control on the liberated territory have been triggering strong responses from the AJK public. Decision-makers would be well advised to proceed with caution, given the sensitivities involved, and to address local concerns with restraint.

Published in Dawn, December 6th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

A new deal
Updated 16 Jun, 2026

A new deal

AFTER three and a half months of war between US-Israel and Iran and an acrimonious temporary ceasefire, a genuine...
Charter of economy
16 Jun, 2026

Charter of economy

NO one expected the PTI to accept the government’s invitation to sign a charter of economy; just as few expected...
Hostage seamen
16 Jun, 2026

Hostage seamen

SOME 50 days on, 11 Pakistani nationals are still in Somali pirates’ captivity. Their appeals to the Pakistani and...
Climate choices
Updated 15 Jun, 2026

Climate choices

The country is confronting increasingly volatile weather patterns with consequences for agriculture, infrastructure, public health and economic planning.
Brief opening
15 Jun, 2026

Brief opening

WE have been here before. Throughout the weekend, there was great anticipation that a tentative framework for peace...
Environmental disaster
15 Jun, 2026

Environmental disaster

IT was a heartbreaking sight. A recent news report in these pages carried a picture of a sea turtle lying half ...