KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Friday issued notices to the Sindh Bar Council, Karachi Bar Association and Sindh High Court Bar Association for assistance on an application filed against a lawyer.

A two-judge bench comprising Justice Salahuddin Panhwar and Justice Adnan-Ul-Karim Memon also put the advocate general, prosecutor general and other respondents on notice for Nov 21.

Applicant Ejaz-ul-Hassan approached SHC against quashment of an FIR lodged on the complaint of a lawyer and submitted that the case was recommended to be cancelled thrice in investigation reports, but due to “unethical behavior and tyranny of complainant” pressure was exerted on magistrate concerned to treat such report as charge-sheet.

The petitioner submitted that the case was registered in 2020 on the pretext that one Ameer Bakhsh had filed an application before him, since the petitioner was a mukhtiarkar, and he allegedly made some illegal demands.

The petitioner also alleged that later, he was forced to reach a settlement, but severally beaten up on the premises of sessions court-East by the lawyer/complainant and his associates.

The bench converted the petition into a criminal miscellaneous application on the request of lawyer for petitioner.

It also directed the registrar of SHC to call a report from the session judge East (Karachi) about the allegations levelled by petitioner and restrained the private respondent/lawyer or any person acting on his behalf from harming the petitioner.

Meanwhile, the same bench also issued notices to the prosecutor general and respondents for Dec 10 in an identical matter.

Petitioner Mohammad Arshad had moved the SHC seeking quashment of two FIRs lodged against him and his son.

He claimed that those false cases were lodged by his own counsel and his two associates and they also allegedly subjected him and his son to physical abuse on court premises.

The bench noted that a fair trial was the right of every person and if there was evidence of physical assault, the court concerned was required to take action.

It also directed the registrar SHC to call report from the district and sessions judge, having jurisdiction of police station where such FIRs were lodged.

The bench further directed the investigating officer to examine a USB, provided by the petitioner about the assault, and proceed further if any offence is committed within court premises.

Besides, the matter may be referred to Sindh Bar Council for the indulgence and action, if required, it added and also issued a restraining order not to harass the petitioner and his family members.

Published in Dawn, November 9th, 2024

Opinion

Respite needed

Respite needed

All one can fear is a familiar accounting exercise that aims to extract a few more rupees from a narrow, weary economic base.

Editorial

Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...
JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...