Imran Khan’s military trial over May 9 cases ‘entirely possible’: PML-N’s Barrister Malik

Published
0
Prime Minister’s spokesperson for legal affairs Barrister Aqeel Malik speaks in an interview on Dawn News programme ‘Doosra Rukh’ on Friday. — DawnNewsTV
Prime Minister’s spokesperson for legal affairs Barrister Aqeel Malik speaks in an interview on Dawn News programme ‘Doosra Rukh’ on Friday. — DawnNewsTV

Government spokesperson for legal affairs Barrister Aqeel Malik has hinted that incarcerated PTI founder Imran Khan’s cases concerning the violence on May 9 last year might go to the military courts.

Countrywide protests erupted on May 9 last year after the paramilitary Rangers whisked away Imran from the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in a corruption case. While the protests were underway, social media was flooded with footage of rioting and vandalism at various spots, including the Lahore Corps Commander’s residence and General Headquarters, the army’s head of office in Rawalpindi.

The already incarcerated former prime minister was “arrested” in these cases on July 15 — just a day after he and his wife, Bushra Bibi, had been apprehended in a new Toshakhana case, following their acquittal in the Iddat case.

In an interview on DawnNewsTV programme Doosra Rukh on Friday, Barrister Malik was questioned whether he thought Imran could be trialled in a military court following the arrest of former intelligence chief Lt-Gen (retired) Faiz Hameed to which he said: “Yes absolutely.”

He said the events and vandalism seen on May 9 invited the application of the Army Act since military installations were attacked and damaged. He alleged that the PTI founder orchestrated and “properly operated” the riots that took place last year.

“This was premeditated. This was preplanned,” Malik said.

He further said regarding military courts that “it is entirely possible that Imran Khan’s trial is held in a military court and the reason for that is because the Army Act will be applicable.”

He said that a lot of people were saying that any conviction by a military could be appealed at the high court, but he added neither the high court nor the Supreme Court could entertain it.

“According to the legal provisions, the appeal for the case would be taken by the military court of appeals,” Malik explained.

He added that once the options of appeals were exhausted, then only the mercy appeal could be submitted to the army chief or the president as a last resort.

Imran has previously claimed that there is a plan to try him in the military court. He has claimed that Hameed was being forced to turn approver against him to pave the way for his trial in a military court on May 9 cases.

Opinion

Editorial

Candid admission
Updated 30 Oct, 2026

Candid admission

Both ruling and opposition parties have lost credibility and political ground due to their ongoing vendetta.
Disrupted LPG supply
30 Oct, 2026

Disrupted LPG supply

THE petroleum minister’s explanation in the National Assembly that the recent closure of the Iran border has...
Judicial disaffection
30 Oct, 2026

Judicial disaffection

THE resignation of Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani from the Lahore High Court is another indicator of the deepening...
Restructuring plans
Updated 29 Oct, 2026

Restructuring plans

The primary reason for governance failure in Pakistan is not the geographical size of the existing provinces but the reluctance of provincial capitals to empower local bodies.
Polluted priorities
Updated 29 Oct, 2026

Polluted priorities

Enforcement must continue, but decisions should follow evidence, not the visibility of machinery on city roads.
Continuing genocide
29 Oct, 2026

Continuing genocide

FOR the people of Gaza, despite the ‘ceasefire’ reached last October, the genocide never really ceased. This ...