LAHORE: A special prosecutor told an antiterrorism court (ATC) on Friday that a joint investigation team had completed its job to the extent of PTI Chairman Imran Khan’s role in the May 9 incidents and found him guilty of abetment and other charges.

In a separate development, the Lahore High Court withdrew its last week’s order that had restrained the Punjab police from taking coercive measures against the former prime minister in the May 9-related cases wherein he had not been nominated.

The PTI chief was present in the ATC as he appeared on the expiry of his pre-arrest bail in five cases relating to the May 9 riots.

Prosecutor Farhad Ali Shah told the ATC that the JIT had completed its investigation and found Mr Khan guilty of the charges, adding that it was no more a case of pre-arrest bail as the arrest of the PTI chief was essential for collection of more evidence.

LHC withdraws order restraining police from acting against PTI chief in cases he is not nominated in

However, judge Abher Gul Khan extended Mr Khan’s pre-arrest bail till Aug 8 and directed the prosecutor and the defence counsel to come up with more arguments.

The judge also extended the pre-arrest bail of PTI’s vice chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi and former secretary general Asad Umar till Aug 8 in multiple cases relating to the riots.

The PTI chief was granted bail in cases regarding attacks on Jinnah House or the corps commander house, Askari Tower, Shadman police station and PML-N’s office as well as torching of a container at Kalma Chowk.

The LHC withdrew its last week’s order that had restrained the police from taking coercive measures against Mr Khan in the May 9-related cases wherein he had not been nominated.

Mr Khan had challenged the consolidation of cases against him and his implication on the basis of supplementary statements of the arrested suspects.

AAG Ghulam Sarwar Nehang argued that interim challans (investigation reports) had been filed in the trial courts and, therefore, the restraining order should be recalled.

Advocate Rana Intizar Hussain, on behalf of the petitioner, requested the court for a short adjournment, saying lead counsel Sardar Latif Khan Khosa was not available due to his appearance before the Supreme Court.

Justice Aalia Neelum turned down the request and observed that law was clear on the matter and could not be changed for an individual. The judge observed that if the cases against the petitioner were bogus then let the trial courts dismiss them.

The PTI chairman pleaded that all the FIRs had been registered on political grounds only to harass and humiliate him and his family and to restrain him from his political struggle.

Published in Dawn, July 22nd, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
Updated 19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

The govt ought to take a direct approach comprising convincing communication with the students and Kyrgyz authorities.
Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...