I BELONG to the generation that had migrated to Pakistan; some perched on the shoulders of their fathers, some in the arms of their mothers, not knowing why they were leaving their homes and what actually was the ultimate destination.

In my generation’s memory, the death of Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah and the assassination of prime minister Liaquat Ali Khan are embedded as the first shocks early in our lives. Soon, events started happening at a rapid pace, leaving people with a clear idea that something was wrong somewhere, indicating that some hidden hands were working behind the scenes.

In contrast, leadership in the neighbouring country quietly and methodically got down to the task of having a constitution and then implementing it effectively. India successfully formulated and implemented the Zamindari Abolition Act of 1951, successfully carving out a positive image for itself.

No such effort was made in Pakistan, because all the relevant stakeholders had successfully established their presence in the corridors of power. Many among those who had migrated post-partition started recalling the prophetic words of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad. “You have no idea [as to] what kind of people you are going to join in Pakistan,” he had told those who were planning to undertake the journey in 1947.

Right from the beginning, it was evident that leaders in West Pakistan were not willing to let the people of East Pakistan have a fair and equal share in the affairs of the new state. The people of East Pakistan agreed to the so-called parity under the One Unit scheme just to keep the country united. Yet, they were pushed to the wall in 1971, and the rest is history.

My generation has witnessed only a turbulent Pakistan. This turmoil is well summarised by Daniel Seth Markey in his book, No Exit from Pakistan: America’s Tortured Relationship with Islamabad, in which he has mentioned that “it has been a policy of Washington … to keep Pakistan under turmoil”, keeping in view its strategic location vis-à-vis China, Iran, Afghanistan and Central Asia. This assertion by Markey leads one to believe that Pakistan

will never have any escape from Washington’s policies and may never see stability even in the years to come.

Abid Mahmud Ansari
Islamabad

Published in Dawn, June 26th, 2023

Opinion

Political capitalism

Political capitalism

Pakistani decision-makers salivate at the prospect of a one-party state but without paying attention to those additional ingredients.

Editorial

Spending restrictions
Updated 13 May, 2024

Spending restrictions

The country's "recovery" in recent months remains fragile and any shock at this point can mean a relapse.
Climate authority
13 May, 2024

Climate authority

WITH the authorities dragging their feet for seven years on the establishment of a Climate Change Authority and...
Vending organs
13 May, 2024

Vending organs

IN these cash-strapped times, black marketers in the organ trade are returning to rake it in by harvesting the ...
A turbulent 2023
Updated 12 May, 2024

A turbulent 2023

Govt must ensure judiciary's independence, respect for democratic processes, and protection for all citizens against abuse of power.
A moral victory
12 May, 2024

A moral victory

AS the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly voted on Friday in favour of granting Palestine greater rights at the...
Hope after defeat
12 May, 2024

Hope after defeat

ON Saturday, having fallen behind Japan in the first quarter of the Sultan Azlan Shah Cup final, Pakistan showed...