Beyond mandate

Published June 24, 2023

IT is another significant milestone in the annals of litigation involving land — specifically, the wholesale handing over of state land to influential quarters through shady means, demonstrating utter disregard for the rule of law. The Lahore High Court on Wednesday struck down a decision by Punjab’s caretaker government to give 45,267 acres of land in the province to the army on a 20-year lease. The transfer would have been the first ‘instalment’ of the one million acres the army wanted to acquire in the province for corporate agriculture farming. The plan had been conceived under the PTI government in 2021 to address the challenge of food security, and the Punjab cabinet at the time had conditionally approved a Statement of Conditions. However, the notification transferring the 45,000-plus acres was issued not by the elected provincial cabinet but by the caretaker dispensation last year. Not only that, the earlier agreed upon SOC was substantially revised, expanding the scope of activities and making the process non-transparent, thereby giving undue advantage to one party in the agreement. The verdict rightly denounces the caretaker set-up for having acted with “undue haste and [in] abhorrent … fashion” to approve the transaction.

The judgement stresses the question of mandate, and trenchantly notes that both the caretaker government and the army had exceeded theirs. It asserts that the army’s primary responsibility is to defend Pakistan and protect its people “without being involved in any kind of political, social or economic divide which may erode its professional capability, neutrality, prestige and pride”. A number of recent judgements by the superior courts have prohibited the security forces from engaging in commercial activity on land allotted to them for defence-related purposes, or even otherwise. In January 2019, the Supreme Court banned all commercial activities on military lands in Karachi, with a two-judge bench asking why the armed forces were running wedding halls and cinemas. Last year, the Islamabad High Court ordered that the Pakistan Navy’s sailing club and farmhouses be demolished, deeming them to have been illegally constructed on national park land. Unfortunately, these landmark verdicts have not been heeded. None of these ventures would have been possible without the collaboration of governing authorities. Neither side seems to have any interest in the equitable distribution of resources, nor any respect for its duty to the people.

Published in Dawn, June 24th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Stirring trouble
Updated 08 Dec, 2024

Stirring trouble

The demands put forth this time are simple and doable at little political cost.
Unfairness in cricket
08 Dec, 2024

Unfairness in cricket

HOPES that cricketing ties between Pakistan and India would be strengthened by the latter team’s visit across the...
Syria rebel advance
08 Dec, 2024

Syria rebel advance

CITY after city in Syria is falling into rebel hands as Bashar al-Assad’s government looks increasingly vulnerable...
Threat perception
Updated 07 Dec, 2024

Threat perception

Despite clear proof of the threat posed by malign armed actors, the military and civilian leadership prefers to focus on political opponents.
Humanity at risk
07 Dec, 2024

Humanity at risk

HUMAN trafficking continues to remain an area where the state has utterly failed its citizens. While global...
Banks and larger goals
07 Dec, 2024

Banks and larger goals

THAT banks in Pakistan “prioritise profit over purpose” and promote financial products with limited knowledge of...