Notices issued on plea seeking details of cases against PTI’s Gandapur

Published
0

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Thursday issued notices to the chief secretary of Sindh and other respondents on a petition seeking details of cases registered against detained leader of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf Ali Amin Gandapur.

The petitioner also asked the SHC to restrain the authorities concerned from arresting the former federal minister again without prior permission of court and not to lodge any fresh FIR against him.

A single-judge bench headed by Justice Omar Sial put the chief secretary, home department secretary and inspector general of Sindh police on notice with direction to file comments till May 3.

Umer Amin Gandapur, a brother of PTI leader, moved the SHC and contended that as per his information, a number of FIRs had been registered against his brother in Dera Ismail Khan, Islamabad and other cities of the country, including police stations in Sindh.

The counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner could exercise his fundamental right to get copies of FIRs registered against his brother, if any, and therefore, approached the police in Sindh, but they were reluctant to provide any kind of information in this regard and it was tantamount to denying right to access to justice and fundamental rights.

He further said that the PTI leader had falsely been implicated in a number of FIRs without rhyme or reason by the present government and the PPP-led provincial government as they were bent on unleashing political persecution on the PTI leader.

Initially, Mr Gandapur was arrested from a court in D.I. Khan, taken to Islamabad and then brought to Lahore and now he has been detained in Central Prison in Sukkur, he added.

The counsel contended that it was a settled principle of law that multiple FIRs under the same offence against a person cannot be lodged and also against the principle of double jeopardy, but all the cases in question were registered against the former minister under the same charges while Section 123-A of the Pakistan Penal Code was the prerogative of the state and could not be invoked by the police or a private persons.

Published in Dawn, April 28th, 2023

Opinion

Emergency matters

Emergency matters

If this new technocratic setup proves to be successful and efficient, it might just end up increasing centralisation of decision-making.

Editorial

Burnt bridges
Updated 20 Oct, 2026

Burnt bridges

If PPP wants the decision reversed, it should convince its ally in Islamabad, not ask the opposition to be ‘positive’.
Toll on trade
20 Oct, 2026

Toll on trade

A YEAR after Islamabad severed commercial ties with Kabul over security concerns, the border trade disruption is...
French protests
20 Oct, 2026

French protests

SEVERAL European states have witnessed mass protests over the past few days, mostly focusing on socioeconomic...
Eating grass for AI
Updated 19 Oct, 2026

Eating grass for AI

As dependence on AI grows, the bill could reach hundreds of millions of dollars by the end of the decade.
Climate exodus
Updated 19 Oct, 2026

Climate exodus

Climate displacement could then become another source of instability unless governments prepare for it together.
Settler terrorism
19 Oct, 2026

Settler terrorism

ISRAEL’S genocidal violence in occupied Gaza has understandably captured the world’s attention. Yet another...