LAHORE: A Lahore High Court judge on Monday recommended the chief justice to constitute a larger bench to decide a petition challenging the powers enjoyed by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to award punishment for contempt under Section 10 of the Elections Act 2017.

Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh observed that important legal points had been raised in the petition, which needed to be heard by a larger bench.

He referred the case to the chief justice with a request to form a larger bench to hear it.

In a September hearing, the judge had issued notices to the respondents and also sought assistance from the attorney general for Pakistan and Punjab advocate general on the ECP’s powers to punish for contempt.

Petitioner Malik Shabbir Ismail through his counsel Azhar Siddique contended that the Supreme Court had in multiple cases held that the Election Commission of Pakistan was neither a court nor a tribunal, therefore, the power conferred upon it under Section 10 could not be exercised for being violative of articles 204 and Article 175 of the Constitution.

Section 10 of the elections act reads: “The Commission may exercise the same power as the High Court to punish any person for contempt of court and the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 (V of 2003), or any other law pertaining to contempt of court shall have effect accordingly as if reference therein to a court and to a judge were a reference, respectively, to the commission and the commissioner or, as the case may be, a member of the commission.”

The counsel contended that the Article 175 clearly referred to courts by categorically stating that there would be a Supreme Court and high courts of each province and such other courts as may be established by the law.

He said the ECP had not been declared or established as a court, however, Section 10 of the Act conferred power of a court upon the commission, without it being established as one.

He further said any order passed by the ECP in pursuance of Section 10 was challengeable before the Supreme Court.

The counsel asked the court to declare that Section 10 of the Elections Act 2017 was in violation of the Constitution, and restrain the Election Commission of Pakistan from taking any action or proceedings under the impugned section.

Published in Dawn, November 22nd, 2022

Opinion

Respite needed

Respite needed

All one can fear is a familiar accounting exercise that aims to extract a few more rupees from a narrow, weary economic base.

Editorial

Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...
JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...