Toshakhana mystery

Published November 17, 2022

THE claims by a Dubai-based Pakistani businessman that he is the one who had purchased a very expensive wristwatch and other articles, gifted to former prime minister Imran Khan by the Saudi crown prince in 2018, against a payment of $2m in cash, has opened a new chapter in the infamous Toshakhana saga. Appearing on a channel’s current affairs programme, Umar Farooq Zahoor, who is allegedly wanted in Turkiye and Norway for financial fraud, and in his home country in a child custody case, claims that Farah Gogi, a close friend of Mr Khan’s wife, had sold him the watch and other articles actually valued at $12m and gifted by Prince Mohammad bin Salman, after former accountability czar Shahzad Akbar, now in self-exile, put him in touch with her. His disclosures won’t have any legal bearing on the case against the PTI chief who was disqualified by the ECP in the Toshakhana reference for making a “false statement” and an “incorrect declaration”. Mr Khan has already challenged the ruling in the Islamabad High Court. There’s no denying that Mr Khan had followed the law while acquiring these gifts for his personal use. But it isn’t good optics, and will show him in a bad light and hurt him politically too.

Naturally, Mr Khan and his party have rebutted the claims, saying the watch and the other gifts were neither sold to Mr Zahoor nor was Farah Gogi involved; they announced they would initiate legal action against Mr Zahoor in Dubai and against the channel and its anchorperson in London for airing the interview. They have the right to do so. However, Mr Khan must come clean on how the gifts were sold and to whom, how the money was transferred, and give a paper trail of the transaction. That is exactly what they are asking Mr Zahoor to do: provide evidence to back his allegations. At the same time, the government should substantiate its claims that the gifts were undervalued when sold to the former premier, as well as investigate the questions raised by the PTI regarding Mr Zahoor’s shady credentials, explaining how his name was removed from the no-fly list and he was allowed to leave the country a month ago. Mr Zahoor should also be asked to provide receipts of the transaction to support his claims. We need answers from all the parties involved since this controversy is proving to be embarrassing for Pakistan in diplomatic circles.

Published in Dawn, November 17th, 2022

Editorial

Budget delay
Updated 04 Jun, 2026

Budget delay

With economic stabilisation yet to translate into tangible improvement in living standards, the country’s leaders are finding it increasingly difficult to ignore demands for relief.
Absentee lawmakers
04 Jun, 2026

Absentee lawmakers

TWENTY per cent. That is the percentage of lawmakers whose commitment to their vocation is reflected in the time ...
Deliberate provocationst
04 Jun, 2026

Deliberate provocationst

THE latest events at Al-Aqsa Mosque reflect the growing impunity with which extremist Israeli settlers operate. ...
Missing confidence
03 Jun, 2026

Missing confidence

For the government, the economy may be more stable now than it was three years ago, but for manufacturers and exporters, it is still difficult to do business.
GB elections
03 Jun, 2026

GB elections

THERE has been some heated politicking in the country’s scenic north in recent days, with Gilgit-Baltistan finally...
The Lebanon factor
03 Jun, 2026

The Lebanon factor

THE fragile calm that followed the recent US-Iran confrontation is being tested. Iran has made it clear that it does...