Politics of gifts

Published September 9, 2022

AFTER a year spent deflecting questions from the media and stonewalling the authorities, there is some light in the Toshakhana case. On Wednesday, PTI chief Imran Khan submitted a reply to the Election Commission of Pakistan wherein he conceded he had sold at least four precious gifts he had received while he was prime minister. According to him, he had procured the items from the state treasury on payment of Rs21.56m and their sale had fetched him around Rs58m. As per Toshakhana rules, any gift assessed to be worth less than Rs30,000 can be retained without any payment to the exchequer. The former premier in his response to the ECP maintained that from July 2018 till Dec 31, 2021 he received a total of 58 gifts, out of which he paid for 14. Mr Khan’s lawyer has urged the ECP bench to quash the case on grounds of it being based on “political motives”.

Politics is indeed being played over the Toshakhana, once a little-known department where gifts from foreign dignitaries to government officials, bureaucrats, etc are stored. Consider the rather gimmicky move by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to put on display the gifts he received on his official trips to Saudi Arabia and the UAE this year and the government notification stating he does not wish to retain any of them. The objective of this ‘transparency’ is clearly to draw a stark contrast with his predecessor’s cageyness over the issue. Mr Khan should have paid heed to the adage, ‘people in glass houses should not throw stones’. After all, his government had filed references against Asif Ali Zardari, Yousuf Raza Gilani and Nawaz Sharif for allegedly abusing the Toshakhana rules in relation to some gifted luxury vehicles. But last September when the Pakistan Information Commission sought details of the gifts presented to Mr Khan, then prime minister, his government refused, claiming implausibly that such disclosure would damage international ties. That gave rise to speculation and then, when the coalition government came to power, to outright allegations about irregularities in the handling of the gifts. Certainly, as Fawad Chaudhry said in his party leader’s defence, “selling one’s own assets is not a crime”, but it is well known that undervaluing of precious items in the Toshakhana is far from uncommon and affords the recipient an extraordinary financial advantage. That is not good optics for a party leader claiming to be a man of the people.

Published in Dawn, September 9th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
Updated 19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

The govt ought to take a direct approach comprising convincing communication with the students and Kyrgyz authorities.
Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...