NAB affirms charges against Ahsan Iqbal in Narowal Sports City reference

Published May 12, 2022
A file photo of PML-N leader Ahsan Iqbal. — DawnNewsTV/File
A file photo of PML-N leader Ahsan Iqbal. — DawnNewsTV/File

ISLAMABAD: As a division bench of the Islamabad High Court resumed hearing of an appeal filed by federal minister Ahsan Iqbal, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) on Wednesday affirmed to the allegations against him and argued that the Narowal Sports City (NSC) reference was different from the Nandipur reference quashed by the IHC.

Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi, the counsel for Mr Iqbal, earlier apprised the IHC that the accountability court dismissed his client’s acquittal plea despite admitting that it was a case of misuse of authority and the amendment to the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) redefined the offence making it conditional with financial gains.

According to the prosecution, the project of Narowal Sports City, formerly known as Sports Stadium Narowal, was initially conceived in 1999 on Mr Iqbal’s directives “without any feasibility study”.

Drawing Mr Bharwana’s attention towards the Nandipur reference in which PTI leader Babar Awan, former law secretary Masood Chishti and others were acquitted, IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah observed that the court defined in detail the concept of misuse of authority and NAB should keep in mind while responding to the acquittal plea of Mr Iqbal.

When the additional prosecutor general of NAB insisted that the NSC reference was different from the Nandipur case because millions of rupees had been released for the project, Justice Minallah remarked that since NAB had stopped the project causing loss of public funds, it also contributed to the crime.

Mr Bharwana argued that amendments to the NAO did not absolve the accused of charges for causing loss to the public exchequer.

Justice Minallah reminded him that the decision in the Nandipur reference was announced before the said amendments and the presidential ordinance affirmed the IHC decision. He also inquired as to why NAB pardoned the federal secretary who was the principal accounting officer of the ministry in this case since he was solely responsible for protecting the public funds and was involved in decision-making, obtaining approvals and executing the project.

Justice Minallah directed the bureau to satisfy the court on the questions raised during the proceedings and adjourned the hearing till June 8.

Published in Dawn, May 12th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

‘Draconian’ law
06 Oct, 2022

‘Draconian’ law

THE debate over what it means to be ‘sadiq’ and ‘ameen’ has reignited after the incumbent Supreme Court ...
Welcome clarity
Updated 06 Oct, 2022

Welcome clarity

There needs to be consensus amongst all political actors that matters of governance should be the exclusive domain of civilians.
Car purchases
06 Oct, 2022

Car purchases

IF we are in the market to buy a new car, we end up paying a significantly large amount as premium over the sticker...
More than economics
Updated 05 Oct, 2022

More than economics

Ishaq Dar’s appointment is but a sign of the paradigm shift in economic policymaking.
Dens of corruption
05 Oct, 2022

Dens of corruption

MOST prisons in Pakistan are a microcosm of the inequitable and exploitative world outside their walls. A probe by...
Football tragedy
05 Oct, 2022

Football tragedy

SPORTS arouses the rawest of human emotions. Football is no exception — in fact, the passions on display at...