Bold decisions

Published January 17, 2022

IT is a double blow within a matter of days. The Islamabad High Court’s order last week to demolish a navy golf course in the capital has come on the heels of the same court ordering two Pakistan Navy projects, including farmhouses and a sailing club to be similarly demolished. These are bold and historic decisions in that they hold powerful entities accountable for abusing their authority and violating land use laws.

In the more recent golf course case, the court found it had illegally been built in a protected park area and that the navy had encroached upon state land without lawful authority and jurisdiction. It has ordered the site sealed and its possession handed over to CDA and the Islamabad Wildlife Management Board. Unless it can be utilised for an environmentally-friendly activity, the golf course is to be demolished within four weeks. The court also ordered the CDA chairman to probe the construction of Monal and other restaurants located on national park land.

Read: 'Are wedding halls and cinemas for defence?' CJP grills govt official over military land's commerical use

If these orders are implemented, it will send an important message to privileged segments of society. Too often, we have seen similar directives about the illegal use of land in Karachi, in which wedding halls and shopping malls have been set up on land allotted for specific military use. But these orders are not complied with and there is no follow-through. Why is it that compliance is only ensured where middle- and lower-income classes are affected?

In the recent Nasla Tower case, for instance, the apex court had expressed its displeasure with the Karachi commissioner for not completing the demolition process in time. To cite another example, when it came to razing Empress Market shops, also ordered by the apex court, the authorities moved with alacrity. The reality is that the rules are different for those that have influence and connections, as compared to those that do not.

In cases where the owners and financiers of illegally constructed property and recreation projects are powerful, court orders are ignored, delayed or simply forgotten. But this leeway is not extended to projects where ‘ordinary’ members of the populace have a stake. It is a sorry reflection of the authorities’ inability or lack of willingness to implement court orders that ruffle elite feathers. The IHC directive to demolish the navy projects is a test case for the Islamabad administration to prove if a ‘naya’ Pakistan is at all possible.

Published in Dawn, January 17th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Privatisation divide
Updated 14 May, 2024

Privatisation divide

How this disagreement within the government will sit with the IMF is anybody’s guess.
AJK protests
14 May, 2024

AJK protests

SINCE last week, Azad Jammu & Kashmir has been roiled by protests, fuelled principally by a disconnect between...
Guns and guards
14 May, 2024

Guns and guards

THERE are some flawed aspects to our society that we must start to fix at the grassroots level. One of these is the...
Spending restrictions
Updated 13 May, 2024

Spending restrictions

The country's "recovery" in recent months remains fragile and any shock at this point can mean a relapse.
Climate authority
13 May, 2024

Climate authority

WITH the authorities dragging their feet for seven years on the establishment of a Climate Change Authority and...
Vending organs
13 May, 2024

Vending organs

IN these cash-strapped times, black marketers in the organ trade are returning to rake it in by harvesting the ...