Capital’s master plan

Published October 18, 2021

IT is encouraging that on Thursday, the restructured commission formed by the federal cabinet to revise Islamabad’s master plan finally met to chalk out the modalities. At the meeting held at the offices of the Capital Development Authority, eight independent committees were formed. Their task is to come up with solutions relating to different aspects of the challenge that include regional planning and transport access, population, and urban, legal and environmental issues. These eight committees will review the city blueprint and, if the need so arises, engage consultants or buttressing government agencies, such as the Ministry of Climate Change for environmental issues. The timeline has been capped at six months.

Due to various reasons, including a rapidly expanding population and market forces, it has not been possible to keep the development of the capital city within the ambit of the original master plan designed by the Greek firm Doxiadis Associates. True, none of our cities show cohesive development — but many of them have a history of organic growth stretching back centuries. For a city established from scratch a handful of decades ago (the Capital of the Republic [Determination of Area] Ordinance was promulgated in 1963), the currently chaotic state of Islamabad demands revision of the master plan with some dynamic measures being taken. From issues such unplanned housing societies (such as Banigala, which was given legal cover retrospectively) and crises of civic infrastructure management as seen in the recent flooding of Sector E-11, to the rapid ‘colonisation’ of areas originally reserved for local growers — for example Chak Shehzad, where small-scale agriculturalists have been forced out of the market by land-price dictates and cold-storage constraints — the problems are myriad. Earlier reviews of the master plan (for example, in 1986 and 2005) were unable to obtain cabinet approval. Now that the exercise is again being undertaken, rather than focus on a restrictive timeline, overarching emphasis must remain on doing the job properly and comprehensively. Bureaucratic haste may later be responsible for a very high cost.

Published in Dawn, October 18th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Privatisation divide
Updated 14 May, 2024

Privatisation divide

How this disagreement within the government will sit with the IMF is anybody’s guess.
AJK protests
14 May, 2024

AJK protests

SINCE last week, Azad Jammu & Kashmir has been roiled by protests, fuelled principally by a disconnect between...
Guns and guards
14 May, 2024

Guns and guards

THERE are some flawed aspects to our society that we must start to fix at the grassroots level. One of these is the...
Spending restrictions
Updated 13 May, 2024

Spending restrictions

The country's "recovery" in recent months remains fragile and any shock at this point can mean a relapse.
Climate authority
13 May, 2024

Climate authority

WITH the authorities dragging their feet for seven years on the establishment of a Climate Change Authority and...
Vending organs
13 May, 2024

Vending organs

IN these cash-strapped times, black marketers in the organ trade are returning to rake it in by harvesting the ...