NAB gets more time to file report on probe into govt projects

Published October 6, 2021
A file photo of the logo of the National Accountability Bureau. — Photo courtesy NAB website/File
A file photo of the logo of the National Accountability Bureau. — Photo courtesy NAB website/File

PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Tuesday granted two more months to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to produce a detailed report on its investigations into the alleged irregularities in the Bank of Khyber recruitment, Billion Tree Tsunami afforestation programme, and Malam Jabba ski resort land lease.

A bench consisting of Justice Roohul Amin Khan and Justice Syed M Attique Shah fixed Dec 8 for the next hearing into a pro bono petition filed by Dr Adil Zareef, Maimoona Noor and four other civil society members seeking it to declare that the NAB had failed to take action on ‘irregularities’ in several prominent projects of the provincial government.

It ordered the production of a detailed report about the three cases before the next hearing.

The petitioners claimed that the NAB was carrying out selective accountability and had put all cases against members of the ruling PTI on the back-burner.

They requested the court to declare that the NAB has failed to perform duties in relation to the cases of the erstwhile KP Ehtesab Commission, alleged corruption in Billion Tree Tsunami project, alleged illegal appointments to the Bank of Khyber (BOK) and irregularities in the Malam Jabba ski resort lease, and that the failure was arbitrary and illegal.

Bureau tells PHC that reference about billion tree initiative prepared

The petitioners also sought the court’s orders for action against the NAB officers, who failed to perform duties about those cases, under the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO), 1999.

Senior advocate Ali Gohar Durrani appeared for the petitioners and requested the court to direct the NAB to act in accordance with the NAO instead of cherry-picking.

He sought action against the NAB officers, who ‘gave undue favours to the accused in those cases by withholding the process of their accountability’.

NAB additional prosecutor general Azeem Dad and senior prosecutor Mohammad Ali informed the bench that investigation about a portion of the Billion Tree Tsunami project in Dera Ismail Khan had been completed and a reference was expected to be filed with the relevant court in near future.

They added that investigation about some other regions was under way and time was required to submit reports about it.

The two said investigation was also done about BOK recruitment and its findings were sent to the NAB headquarters to decide whether to file a reference or not.

They also sought time for producing a report about the Malam Jabba land lease issue.

The counsel for petitioners complained that the NAB hadn’t showed any progress in the Billion Tree Tsunami and BOK cases.

The respondents in the petition are the federation of Pakistan through the law secretary, interior secretary, NAB through its chairman, NAB executive board through its chairman, and NAB KP through its director-general.

Published in Dawn, October 6th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Election time
Updated 27 Jan, 2023

Election time

There are concerns whether the ECP will be sufficiently able to protect the integrity of elections if they are held under partisan governments.
SCO invite
27 Jan, 2023

SCO invite

THOUGH India’s invitation to Pakistan to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation events in Goa later this ...
Call to arms
27 Jan, 2023

Call to arms

ONE way the state abdicates responsibility in Pakistan is by farming out its functions to the private sector. In ...
Nuclear miscalculations
26 Jan, 2023

Nuclear miscalculations

IF the claim of former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, that Pakistan and India came close to a nuclear exchange...
Exchange rate cap
26 Jan, 2023

Exchange rate cap

THE ‘management’ of the exchange rate by the State Bank, allegedly at the behest of the government, to ward off...
Fawad’s arrest
Updated 26 Jan, 2023

Fawad’s arrest

Does the state really need to fan public discontent in a period as fraught with uncertainty as this?