Plea for NAB reference against Khusro Bakhtiar dismissed

Published June 13, 2021
Opposing the petitioner, NAB special prosecutor Asadullah Awan argued that the accountability court had no jurisdiction to order the bureau for filing a reference. — APP/File
Opposing the petitioner, NAB special prosecutor Asadullah Awan argued that the accountability court had no jurisdiction to order the bureau for filing a reference. — APP/File

LAHORE: An accountability court on Saturday dismissed a petition seeking a direction to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to file its investigation report and a reference against federal minister Makhdoom Khusro Bakhtiar on charges of accumulating illegal assets.

Ahsan Abid, a lawyer from Rahim Yar Khan, had filed the petition under section 17-C & 18-F of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999.

The petitioner’s counsel, Aftab Ahmad Bajwa, argued that the minister and his brothers owned six sugar mills, several investment companies and agricultural land beyond known sources of their income.

He said the NAB’s Multan office had conducted an initial inquiry in 2018 into the assets of the minister’s family and found these unexplained.

He pointed out that a regional board meeting on Dec 11, 2018 decided to forward the matter to the NAB headquarters with recommendation of a complete inquiry and further action in accordance with law.

The counsel argued that the NAB was bound to complete the inquiry and submit its report before the relevant accountability court. However, he alleged, the bureau had not submitted the report due to the pressure of the federal minister. He asked the court to issue an order to the NAB to submit an investigation report and a reference on the complaint of the petitioner.

Opposing the petitioner, NAB special prosecutor Asadullah Awan argued that the accountability court had no jurisdiction to order the bureau for filing a reference. He said the accountability court could not seek a report during investigation as its jurisdiction starts once a reference is filed before it. He asked the court to dismiss the petition.

After hearing arguments from both sides, Presiding Judge Sajjad Ahmad dismissed the petition for being not maintainable. The reasons for the dismissal of the petition would be given in a detailed order.

Published in Dawn, June 13th, 2021

Opinion

De-programming the robot
25 Jul 2021

De-programming the robot

The robot that is programmed to be a predator, to dominate, to hurt, to rape, to kill, will do as he pleases, where he pleases...
A toxic discourse
Updated 25 Jul 2021

A toxic discourse

Politics as it exists now is a catalyst for further divisions...
Cyberespionage
25 Jul 2021

Cyberespionage

Sellers of surveillance tools must be held accountable...
Managing human agency
24 Jul 2021

Managing human agency

Is the private sector able to manage the ‘human agency’ of teachers better than the public sector?...

Editorial

Noor murder case
Updated 25 Jul 2021

Noor murder case

IT would not be an exaggeration to describe Pakistan as no country for women. This truth was underscored yet again...
25 Jul 2021

Rental inflation

HOUSE rent prices soared in June by 6.21pc from 4.2pc a year ago, topping the list of 10 contributors to the urban...
Cyberattack on rights
Updated 24 Jul 2021

Cyberattack on rights

A COLLABORATIVE investigation into a data leak of software sold by the Israeli surveillance company NSO Group has ...
24 Jul 2021

Sleeper cells

THERE was a time not too long ago when militant groups had unleashed a reign of terror in Pakistan, resulting in...
24 Jul 2021

Prisoners’ return

THE families of 62 Pakistani prisoners who had been imprisoned in Saudi Arabia had reason to rejoice this Eid as...