APROPOS the account of a session at the Lahore Literary Festival (LLF) ‘Khudai Khidmatgars history was suppressed after Partition’ (Feb 21), it was disappointing going through the details and how Mukulika Banerjee of the London School of Economics mentioned only one side of the Khudai Khidmatgars and Abdul Ghaffar Khan.

She mentioned the association of Khudai Khidmatgars with the Indian National Congress, lamenting that they were considered traitors during the freedom struggle for Pakistan.

Another panelist, Afrasiab Khattak, bemoaned that “Pakistanis did not have good history books”. He is not alone in his criticism by the way. Pakistanis at large also have a strong desire that the role played by the Khudai Khidmatgars and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind and its component parties should be discussed in detail in the history books published in Pakistan in order to let the public know the facts as they were.

Banerjee’s objections that Khudai Khidmatgars were suppressed and silenced are baseless, misplaced, and represent a distorted version of history. Afrasiab Khattak and Banerjee should be honest enough to acknowledge that all the component parties of Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind and Khudai Khidmatgars, who had strongly opposed the popular movement for the creation of Pakistan under the leadership of the Quaid-i-Azam, were given a free hand to participate in the political process in Pakistan.

So much so, that Abdul Ghaffar Khan’s son Abdul Wali Khan formed the National Awami Party, Nawabzada Nasrullah renamed his Majlis-i-Ahrar as Pakistan Democratic Party (PDP), and religious components of the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind wasted no time in establishing their offices in almost every city of Pakistan.

The nation has witnessed how they have actively participated in national politics since the creation of Pakistan. On top of all that, Khudai Khidmatgars, reincarnated as the ANP, were free enough to name the Peshawar airport the Bacha Khan airport, and Nawabzada Nasrullah was given the title of ‘Baba-i-Jamhuriat’.

The like of Banerjee and Afrasiab Khattak know better than anyone else how opponents of popular movements are purged after the success of popular movements.

Abid Mahmud Ansari
Islamabad

Published in Dawn, March 2nd, 2021

Opinion

For whom the clock ticks
Updated 22 Apr 2021

For whom the clock ticks

Tarin will have to succeed in order to cement his position within the cabinet.
Ending the ‘forever war’
Updated 21 Apr 2021

Ending the ‘forever war’

Regardless of who the adversary was at any point, two generations of Afghans have known only war.

Editorial

22 Apr 2021

Capping power debt

THE suggested revision in the Circular Debt Management Plan, which aims to cap the flow or addition of new debt to...
22 Apr 2021

Istanbul postponement

WHILE the postponement of the Istanbul peace talks on Afghanistan, which were scheduled to be held later this week,...
22 Apr 2021

No mining precautions

YET another accident caused by a methane gas explosion has been reported from the dangerous coal mines of...
More mishandling
Updated 21 Apr 2021

More mishandling

By its bad decision-making and weak management, the govt has allowed the TLP to garner more importance and heft than it deserves.
21 Apr 2021

Declining FDI

THE sharp decline in FDI in recent months is worrisome. New State Bank data shows that FDI has plummeted by a hefty...
21 Apr 2021

The digital divide

IN the Economist Intelligence Unit’s annual Inclusive Internet Index report, measuring internet inclusion in terms...