ISLAMABAD: Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday issued notices to the nephew of Prime Minister Imran Khan, assistant commissioner (rural), the district magistrate and Banigala SHO on a petition filed against ‘forced’ acquisition of petitioners land.

The petitioners Azmatullah and Mohammad Umar Gondal filed the petition through their counsel Raja Rizwan Abbasi and Danish Abbasi.

The petition stated that petitioners purchased land measuring 30 kanals in Mohra Noor Islamabad which is adjacent to the land of Prime Minister Imran Khan.

It said that out of 30 kanals, they have sold 16 kanals while 14 kanals of land was in their possession.

According to the petition, the petitioners started landscaping and designed the land to convert it into orchard, labourers were also hired for this purpose. However, the assistant commissioner (rural) and SHO Banigala stopped them from construction.

When the petitioners approached the district magistrate (deputy commissioner) and others, they were told that Shahraz Azeem Khan, nephew of Prime Minister Imran Khan, is interested in buying their land and advised the petitioner that “it is better for them to sell this land” to PM’s nephew.

The petition contended that the district administration and the Banigala SHO “gave a self-style advice to petitioners to sell this property” in favour of Shahraz Azeem Khan at lucrative price and informed them that since this property is adjacent to the property of the prime minister and one of the respondents Shahraz Khan is the nephew of Imran Khan, “thus it is better for them to get rid of this piece of land adding that the deputy commissioner, AC rural and SHO Banigala also extended threats to the petitioners that they would never allow them to carry out any kind of activity in the land because of influence of some superior quarters.

It said that the petitioners were called by deputy commissioner when they reached his office, he arranged their telephonic conversation with PM’s nephew. The petitioners claimed that Shahraz Khan categorically asked them to sell their land or face consequences.

As per the petition, the district administration threatened the petitioners they would be placed in fourth schedule of Anti Terrorism Act or they would be jailed under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Public Order and when they will come out of prison, their property would be occupied and they would never be compensated.

According to the petition, under Article 23 of the constitution any citizen has right to hold or dispose of his property.

The petitioners requested the court to declare the forced acquisition of their lawful land as illegal and restrain the district administration and police from interfering into this matter.

Published in Dawn, February 18th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
Updated 26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

There is no doubt that these issues are impeding a positive business clime, which is required to boost private investment and economic growth.
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...