The Hague (Netherlands): People ride their bikes as environmental activists protest outside a court on Tuesday during a hearing in a case environmentalists and human rights groups have brought on against Royal Dutch Shell to force the firm to cut its reliance on fossil fuels.—Reuters
The Hague (Netherlands): People ride their bikes as environmental activists protest outside a court on Tuesday during a hearing in a case environmentalists and human rights groups have brought on against Royal Dutch Shell to force the firm to cut its reliance on fossil fuels.—Reuters

THE HAGUE: Environmental groups faced off against Shell before a Dutch court on Tuesday in a landmark bid to force the oil giant to meet emissions targets in the Paris climate accord.

The “historic” case being heard in The Hague was launched in 2019 by the Netherlands branch of Friends of the Earth, backed by 17,300 Dutch citizens who have registered as co-complainants.

Six other activist groups including the Dutch branches of Greenpeace and Action Aid are backing the lawsuit against the Anglo-Dutch multinational, whose failure to act “endangers the future of our children”, they said.

The 2015 Paris accords committed all nations to cut carbon emissions to limit warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels and encouraged them to go down to 1.5 degrees.

“Shell’s corporate policy is on a collision course with the global climate target,” Roger Cox, lawyer for the environmental NGOs, told the court.

The company “contributes to the realisation of great danger to humanity, human rights, future generations, the environment, and nature,” said Cox.

“The Shell Group is the 11th-largest industrial polluter in the world in terms of CO2 emissions,” he added.

“The company is one of a select group of 25 multinational companies that have caused more than half of global industrial greenhouse gas emissions in the past 30 years.”

Shell lawyer Dennis Horeman said the company was “already taking serious steps” to support the global transition away from the fossil fuels, and that the ultimate decision rested with governments.

Published in Dawn, December 2nd, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Cipher acquittal
Updated 04 Jun, 2024

Cipher acquittal

Our state, in its desperation to victimise another ex-PM, once again left them looking like more of a hero than they perhaps deserved to be.
China sojourn
04 Jun, 2024

China sojourn

AS the prime minister begins his five-day visit to China today, investment — particularly to reinvigorate the...
Measles resurgence
04 Jun, 2024

Measles resurgence

THE alarming rise in measles cases across Pakistan signals a burgeoning public health crisis that demands immediate...
Large projects again?
Updated 03 Jun, 2024

Large projects again?

Government must focus on debt sustainability by curtailing its spending and mobilising more resources.
Local power
03 Jun, 2024

Local power

A SIGNIFICANT policy paper was recently debated at an HRCP gathering, calling for the constitutional protection of...
Child-friendly courts
03 Jun, 2024

Child-friendly courts

IN a country where the child rights debate has been a belated one, it is heartening to note that a recent Supreme...