'The sword is still hanging': Legal fraternity reacts to SC's decision to quash reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa

Published June 19, 2020
The Pakistan Bar Council has announced that all it's members will observe Youm-e-Tashakkur on June 22 for the "landmark judgement" by the Supreme Court. — Photo courtesy: Supreme Court website
The Pakistan Bar Council has announced that all it's members will observe Youm-e-Tashakkur on June 22 for the "landmark judgement" by the Supreme Court. — Photo courtesy: Supreme Court website

The Supreme Court on Friday accepted Justice Qazi Faez Isa's petitions challenging the filing of a presidential reference against him.

The top court threw out the presidential reference, terming it "invalid" and also withdrew the show cause notice issued to Justice Isa last year by the Supreme Judicial Council.

“[The reference] is declared to be of no legal effect whatsoever and stands quashed,” read the judgement.

However, while most hailed the decision a landmark judgement, some expressed reservations, saying that the matter may be far from over.


President of the Supreme Court Bar Association Hafiz Abdur Rehman Ansari, in a statement, "highly appreciated" the top court's verdict and commended it for "its courageous demonstration guarding its independence [and] thus upholding the prime objective of the rule of law and supremacy of the Constitution".


Vice chairman of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) Abid Saqi said that the SC verdict had "frustrated the nefarious and ill-motivated move of the government to subdue and pressurise the independent judiciary".

The PBC also announced that all bar members will observe Youm-e-Tashakkur (day of gratefulness) on June 22. They will also celebrate what the council termed a "landmark judgement and the victory of the cause of the rule of law, the constitutionalism and independence of the judiciary".


Zahid F. Ebrahim, an advocate of the Supreme Court, said that while the court had "slashed he malicious hand attempting assault on its independence", it had also showed that it was open to financial accountability.


Reema Omer, a legal advisor for the International Commission of Jurists said that the case "was still not over". She added that the detailed judgement "should clarify why presidential reference didn’t meet this criteria [for genuine and bonafide grievances]".


Dr Osama Siddique, executive director of the Law and Policy Research Network, questioned the SC's decision.

"Why can SJC come into play again? Surely this is a matter now that pertains only to the wife. Can something else be discovered, uncovered or concocted that the FBR takes back to the SC/SJC so that J. Isa can be pulled back in again. In which case the sword is still hanging."


Lawyer and activist Jibran Nasir said that the end of ill intent was always failure.


Lawyer Taimur Malik said that it didn't seem as though the matter was over, adding that it would be better if the government and the judiciary went back to focusing on "other important work".

Opinion

Editorial

Crime against humanity
Updated 03 Dec 2021

Crime against humanity

The government has yet to fulfil its long-standing pledge to criminalise enforced disappearances.
03 Dec 2021

Revised valuations

THE revised property valuations notified by the FBR for 40 cities for the purpose of collecting federal taxes —...
03 Dec 2021

PWD await rights

ON the International Day of Disabled Persons, it is important to take stock of how far Pakistan has come in ensuring...
02 Dec 2021

Funding for polls

THE PTI government’s autocratic mentality is again on full display, even as it feigns adherence to the law....
02 Dec 2021

Soaring prices

PRICES are surging. And they are increasing at a much faster pace than anticipated, burdening millions of...
Ali Wazir’s bail
Updated 02 Dec 2021

Ali Wazir’s bail

IT has been a long time coming, but MNA and Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement leader Ali Wazir has finally been granted bail...