Kamal favours changes in 18th Amendment, not its rollback

Published May 16, 2020
ak Sarzameen Party (PSP) chairman Syed Mustafa Kamal has been very vocal against 18th Amendment. — Dawn/File
ak Sarzameen Party (PSP) chairman Syed Mustafa Kamal has been very vocal against 18th Amendment. — Dawn/File

KARACHI: As the debate on the future of 18th Amendment to the Constitution is going on, Pak Sarzameen Party (PSP) chairman Syed Mustafa Kamal has said that the landmark legislation does not need to be scrapped but needs some amendments.

Kamal has been very vocal against 18th Amendment because no provincial government, especially the Sindh government, ever bothered to devolve powers they get from the Centre as a result of the constitutional amendment at the grassroots level i.e. local governments.

Not only the PSP, its nemesis, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan is also very critical of the 18th Amendment, mainly because of the Pakistan Peoples Party’s government in Sindh, and it time and again said that the people had been deceived in the name of 18th Amendment that in fact, according to party convener Dr Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui, led to “accumulation of powers” instead of “devolution of powers”.

“The fruits of 18th Amendment can only be reaped by empowering the people to the grassroots level through legal reforms,” said PSP chief Kamal while speaking at a meeting of his party’s central executive committee and national council.

Commenting about the constitution of the 10th National Finance Commission (NFC), he said that like NFC award, the provincial finance commission (PFC) award was also necessary so that all the funds, which lie with the chief ministers, should flow towards districts in a judicious manner.

“A complete chapter about local governments must be added [to the Constitution] by amending the 18th Amendment,” he said, adding: “An incomplete amendment is harming the country instead of benefiting it.”

He said that this important issue was raised before the 2018 general elections, but the rulers of that time preferred “personal interests over the national interest”.

The latest debate on 18th Amendment has begun after key Planning and Development Minister Asad Umar said during a TV talk show that the 18th Amendment had some defects and called for reviewing it.

It gained momentum when Federal Information Minister Shibli Faraz said that the legislation was a hurdle in preparing a uniform policy to fight the coronavirus across the country as after the amendment the federal government’s role in various spheres had been limited to issuing policy guidelines.

However, earlier this week Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi had told the Senate that the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf-led government had no plans to scrap the 18th Amendment, saying all its “positive” features were acceptable to the government, but there was a need to revisit the “weak” parts.

Major opposition parties — the PPP, Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl, Awami National Party, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz — had made it clear that they would not allow the rollback of the historic amendment and protect the provincial autonomy granted under the 18th Amendment at all costs.

Published in Dawn, May 16th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...