Litigation prevents FBR from collecting Rs88bn income tax

Published March 5, 2020
The amount has not been recovered because taxpayers have challenged the claims high courts and the Supreme Court. — AFP/File
The amount has not been recovered because taxpayers have challenged the claims high courts and the Supreme Court. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: Court cases related to income tax collection have stopped the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) from recovering Rs87.42 billion from taxpayers.

According to an audit report presented before the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) at its meeting, the huge amount has been stuck because taxpayers have challenged the income tax claims in the customs, excise and sales tax tribunals, the high courts and the Supreme Court.

Acting chairperson of the FBR Nosheen Javed Amjad informed the PAC that the bureau could not recover the amount because 96 cases were pending against the claims. Some cases have been pending in the high courts since 2011 and 2012.

Ms Amjad said the FBR had taken up the matter with the chief justices of the Sindh High Court, Lahore High Court and Islamabad High Court and requested them to constitute special benches on tax matters for swift disposal of cases.

PAC chairman Rana Tanvir Hussain said that speedy recovery of taxes would reduce the huge shortfall of tax collection.

PAC grills aviation secretary over construction of parallel runways at Islamabad airport

The legal adviser of the FBR informed the PAC that 65 income tax-related cases were pending in the tribunals, 27 in the high court and four in the Supreme Court.

The audit report has also pointed out irregularities in the accounts of the FBR to the tune of Rs142.2 million for fiscal year 2012-13.

Earlier, the PAC grilled Aviation Secretary Hassan Nasir Jami since he could not satisfy the committee over construction of parallel runways at the Islamabad International Airport.

An audit report presented before the committee cited the International Standards and Recommended Practices — Aerodrome Design and Operations according to which “where parallel instrument runways are intended for simultaneous use, the minimum distance between their centrelines should be at least 1km”.

However, the audit report pointed out that the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) had constructed a secondary runway parallel to the main runway with a distance of 210 metres between the centrelines of both runways.

The audit report said that “unjustified expenditure on secondary runway” had cost a Rs719 million loss to the national kitty.

Mr Jami told the committee that the parallel runway was not intended for simultaneous landings but it was designed as an alternative runway.

The auditors termed this reply as unsatisfactory saying that “there was vast difference between the specifications of runway and taxiway and there is no provision in bill of the quantity and recommendations of the CAA Operations Directorate for construction of a secondary runway in addition to a parallel taxiway.

The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) told the committee that it had finalised an inquiry into this matter and referred it to the interior ministry for seeking approval for action against those officials who were responsible for committing negligence in this matter.

The committee however directed the secretary aviation to fix responsibility for such negligence and submit a report in this regard in a fortnight.

Published in Dawn, March 5th, 2020

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.