13 PTM activists booked over hate speech

Published February 11, 2020
PTM local leader Mullah Behram was detained as the police was carrying out raids to arrest other activists nominated in the FIR. — APP/File
PTM local leader Mullah Behram was detained as the police was carrying out raids to arrest other activists nominated in the FIR. — APP/File

QUETTA: Loralai police on Monday registered a case against 13 activists of the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) for allegedly making hate speeches.

They also arrested a PTM activist, Mullah Behram.

The first information report (FIR) lodged by SHO of Loralai police station Sardar Abdul Rehman against the activists’ mentions Pakistan Penal Code’s Sections 153-A (promoting enmity between different groups), 342 (Punishment for wrongful confine­ment), 283 (Danger or obstruction in public way), 506 (Punishment for criminal intimidation), and under Section 16 of MPO (Maintenance of Public Order) ordinance.

According to the police, the activists had chanted slogans against the security forces during a procession at the Bagh football stadium in Loralai.

PTM local leader Mullah Behram was detained as the police was carrying out raids to arrest other activists nominated in the FIR.

Published in Dawn, February 11th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.