PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Tuesday issued notices to the attorney general for Pakistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa advocate general on a petition requesting it to declare unconstitutional a provision of the Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976, which allows the Pakistan Bar Council to give a call for nationwide strike.
A bench consisting of Chief Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Abdul Shakoor after preliminary arguments admitted to full hearing the petition of lawyer Ali Azim Afridi, who requested the court to declare Rule 175-E of the Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Rules, 1976, in conflict with the Constitution.
The bench observed that as rules were challenged, it would be appropriate to hear the viewpoint of the attorney general and advocate general.
The petitioner also requested the court to declare unconstitutional Rule 176-B to the extent of non-observance or defiance of the PBC decisions by lawyers regarding strike or protest.
Ali Azim said the rule provided that non-observance or defiance of decisions of the Pakistan Bar Council by any bar council or bar association or any member of the Bar should be deemed to be a gross professional misconduct.
PHC admits petition against rules allowing bar council’s call for strike
He requested the court to direct the PBC not to block or hamper the appearance of his, other lawyers and people before the courts.
The respondents in the petition are the federation of Pakistan through the federal law secretary, PBC through its vice-chairman, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council through its vice-chairman, PHC Bar Association through its secretary general, PHC registrar and KP law secretary.
The petition was filed last month when lawyers observed a strike for many days on different issues. Initially, a strike was observed from Dec 9 to Dec 11 on the call of the KP Bar Council against certain amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure and introduction of a new anti-narcotics law.
On Dec 12, the lawyers boycotted courts to protest the killing of their community member, Feroze Shah, in Swat. A strike was observed on Dec 13 across the country against the arrest of several lawyers over the Punjab Institute of Cardiology attack.
Ali Azim contended that the Constitution provided for access to justice, which was both a right in itself and the means of protecting and restoring other basic rights.
The petitioner said the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973, was enacted in 1973 allowing the PBC to make rules within meaning of Section 55 of the Act.
He said the right to access to justice was a fundamental right provided for by the Constitution and as such, the call of strike and protest at national level prevented lawyers from performing their duty and that, too, to the discredit of the people.
Ali Azim said the law nowhere provided for taking action over non-observance and defiance of instructions pertaining to call of strike and protest issued by the PBC but under the rules, the same amounted to misconduct.
Published in Dawn, January 8th, 2020
