Law minister accused of misconduct, case referred to disciplinary committee

Published October 10, 2019
The Executive Committee of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) on Wednesday accused Law Minister Barrister Farogh Nasim of misconduct and referred his matter to the disciplinary committee headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial of the Supreme Court. — APP/File
The Executive Committee of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) on Wednesday accused Law Minister Barrister Farogh Nasim of misconduct and referred his matter to the disciplinary committee headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial of the Supreme Court. — APP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Executive Committee of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) on Wednesday accused Law Minister Barrister Farogh Nasim of misconduct and referred his matter to the disciplinary committee headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial of the Supreme Court.

According to the PBC Executive Committee, a lawyer after assuming public office is duty-bound to get his practising licence suspended from the PBC, but Barrister Nasim didn’t follow this practice.

Subsequently, the PBC itself suspended Barrister Nasim’s licence. However, he challenged the suspension before the attorney general.

Suspension of Farogh Nasim’s licence has become the root cause of row

The attorney general restored the licence of the minister. The PBC challenged the attorney general’s decision before the Supreme Court, which referred the matter to the PBC.

The PBC Executive Committee said that despite issuing five show-cause notices to Barrister Nasim, he did not file a reply and even termed the show-cause notices illegal. Subsequently, the committee declared that the reply of Barrister Nasim was not satisfactory and accused him of misconduct.

The executive committee, after suspending the licence of Barrister Nasim, referred the matter to the disciplinary committee. Justice Bandial is the chairman of the PBC disciplinary committee that can revoke the licence of a lawyer for misconduct.

Meanwhile, the PBC also criticised recent appointments of law officers in high courts and the Supreme Court and termed them “pre-poll rigging” ahead of the annual election of the Supreme Court Bar Association.

The law ministry had on Oct 8, 2019, appointed about two dozen additional, deputy and assistant attorneys general through a notification.

According to a press release issued by the PBC, “new appointments of advocates as law officers and removal of many of the serving law officers, at this juncture when the process of election of Supreme Court Bar Association has reached an advance stage, a a motivated attempt on the part of the government to influence the election and thus it amounts to pre-poll rigging which the legal fraternity strongly condemns and disapproves”.

The SCBA elections are scheduled to be held in the last week of the current month.

Published in Dawn, October 10th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

WITH the country confronting one of its gravest economic crises, it is time for the government and business ...
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...