WASHINGTON, July 31: US policy analysts consider the apparent arms race between India and Pakistan as posing perhaps the most likely prospect for the future use of nuclear weapons by states, says the latest congressional report on US-Pakistan relations.

The report by the Congressional Research Service, which prepares policy papers for US legislators, is the first since July 18, 2005, when the United States and India signed an agreement for nuclear cooperation, causing a sense of heightened insecurity in Pakistan.

The report highlights continued US support to Pakistan’s efforts to improve its military arsenal and discloses that since 2002 Pakistan has refurbished a substantial part of its fleet of American made F-16 fighter jets with US assistance.

Referring to a new US-India defence framework agreement signed on June 28, 2005, the CRS notes that Pakistan has expressed concern over this agreement because Islamabad feels that it could lead to “induction of advanced weapons systems into the region” and “the destabilization of the strategic balance” there.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice telephoned Foreign Minister Khurshid Kasuri after the agreement and assured him that the United States will “remain responsive to Pakistan’s security concerns”.

The report includes a brief review of the nuclear dispute in South Asia and mentions that in May 1998, India conducted unannounced nuclear tests, breaking a 24-year, self-imposed moratorium on such testing. The Indian tests led to a nuclear race in the Subcontinent with both countries now possessing nuclear weapons.

The report estimates that Pakistan currently possesses enough fissile material, mainly enriched uranium, for 55-90 nuclear weapons; India, with a programme focused on plutonium, may be capable of building a similar number.

Both countries have aircraft capable of delivering nuclear bombs.

Pakistan’s military has inducted short-and medium-range ballistic missiles, allegedly acquired from China and North Korea, while India possesses short-and-intermediate-range missiles.

All these missiles “are assumed to be capable of delivering nuclear warheads over significant distances,” warns the congressional report, which also mentions that in 2000, Pakistan placed its nuclear forces under the control of a National Command Authority led by the president.

The congressional paper refers to various media reports claiming that the A.Q. Khan network provided nuclear technologies to Iran, Libya and North Korea. But it also notes that the United States has been assured that Islamabad had no knowledge of such activities and that the decision to pardon Dr A. Q. Khan was an internal Pakistani matter. President Musharraf has promised President Bush that he will share all information learned about Dr Khan’s proliferation network, says the CRS report, but not allow direct access to Dr Khan.

Opinion

Enter the deputy PM

Enter the deputy PM

Clearly, something has changed since for this step to have been taken and there are shifts in the balance of power within.

Editorial

All this talk
Updated 30 Apr, 2024

All this talk

The other parties are equally legitimate stakeholders in the country’s political future, and it must give them due consideration.
Monetary policy
30 Apr, 2024

Monetary policy

ALIGNING its decision with the trend in developed economies, the State Bank has acted wisely by holding its key...
Meaningless appointment
30 Apr, 2024

Meaningless appointment

THE PML-N’s policy of ‘family first’ has once again triggered criticism. The party’s latest move in this...
Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...