IMF warns US-China trade war will ‘jeopardise’ global growth

Published
2
IMF directly refutes Trump’s claim that tariffs are paid by China and provide a windfall for the US treasury. — Reuters/File
IMF directly refutes Trump’s claim that tariffs are paid by China and provide a windfall for the US treasury. — Reuters/File

WASHINGTON: The IMF sounded the alarm on Thursday about the escalating US-China trade war, warning it will “jeopardise” 2019 global growth, undermine confidence and raise prices for consumers.

Gita Gopinath, the International Monetary Fund’s chief economist, directly refuted President Donald Trump’s claim that tariffs are paid by China and provide a windfall for the US treasury, and that his aggressive posture will help reduce the US trade deficit.

She and her co-authors warned in a blog post that the economic damage will be even worse if Trump goes through with the threat to impose steep tariffs on all goods imported from China, as that “will subtract about one-third of a percentage point of global GDP in the short term.” Optimism was high earlier this month that a deal was within striking distance but tensions erupted after Trump accused Beijing of backtracking on its commitments made over the year of negotiations.

He then more than doubled tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods to 25pc and threatened to hit the remaining $300bn in products imported each year with duties at the same level.

“Consumers in the US and China are unequivocally the losers from trade tensions,” Gopinath stated, noting that the “tariff revenue collected has been borne almost entirely by US importers.” IMF chief Christine Lagarde and other fund officials have repeatedly raised concerns about the trade war but the blog post quantified the realised and expected damage, presenting the case with greater urgency.

Trump says a primary goal of the aggressive tariff strategy is to reduce the trade imbalance with China, which totaled $379bn last year.

But Gopinath argues that while the tensions have damaged both countries, reducing overall trade and hurting companies, “the bilateral trade deficit remains broadly unchanged.”

Meanwhile, total US imports have not changed significantly since importers simply shifted their purchases to other countries.

Published in Dawn, May 24th, 2019

Follow Dawn Business on X, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Privatisation framework
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Privatisation framework

The proposed merger of the Privatisation Commission and the Public-Private Partnership Authority (P3A) into a single institution is a sensible move.
Chromebook scheme
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Chromebook scheme

Technology can widen opportunity, but only when it is tied to good teaching, reliable connectivity and clear educational purpose.
Dengue season
27 Oct, 2026

Dengue season

ANOTHER dengue outbreak looms over the country for reasons of lack of preparedness and negligence. This month’s...
Wheat price dilemma
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Wheat price dilemma

A price no buyer is obliged or financially equipped to pay is only a number. Growers seem to have grasped this before the government did.
Encounter culture
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Encounter culture

Whether police actions in "encounters" were legitimate or unlawful can only be established through credible investigations.
Recognising distress
26 Oct, 2026

Recognising distress

THE deaths of two families in Karachi, being investigated as suspected murder-suicides, raise disturbing questions...