SC rules in Zulfi Bukhari's favour, dismisses petition seeking his disqualification

Published
57
Zulfi Bukhari's appointment as a special assistant to the PM was challenged in the SC. — File
Zulfi Bukhari's appointment as a special assistant to the PM was challenged in the SC. — File

The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition seeking the disqualification of Syed Zulfikar Ali Bukhari aka Zulfi Bukhari, the prime minister's special assistant on overseas Pakistanis and human resource development.

A three-member bench of the apex court, under Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar's stewardship, was told by the petitioner today that the Supreme Court's decision on dual nationality holders applies to Bukhari.

It is pertinent to mention here that the court, in its December 15 verdict, had declared that persons with dual nationality could not retain important government positions as they should choose between a government job and a foreign nationality.

Justice Ijazul Ahsan contested the petitioner's claim, with the chief justice clarifying that the SC had not imposed a ban in the dual nationality case and had instead only made its recommendations to the parliament.

"You should have challenged the rules of business against Zulfi Bukhari's appointment," the top judge suggested.

"The appointment of a special assistant is the prime minister's right," Justice Ahsan said, adding: "Zulfi Bukhari's case does not come under Article 62 and 63 of the Constitution."

The petitioner's counsel, however, pointed out that "Zulfi Bukhari is signing foreign agreements; this is the job of a minister."

"He is working as a minister and even attending cabinet meetings," he added.

Bukhari's counsel Aitzaz Ahsan contested the petitioner's claim, saying that his client "has not claimed the status of a state minister".

At this, the chief justice told the petitioner that the court cannot sack Bukhari on his petition and can only make suggestions to the parliament.

Justice Nisar, however, sought details of Bukhari's credentials and ordered that the summary through which he was appointed a special assistant be presented in the court.

"If appointing his special assistant is the prime minister's right, it does not mean that he can do whatever he likes," the judge remarked.

After the hearing resumed following a break, the court set aside the petition but barred Bukhari from claiming the status of a minister, warning that "if he goes beyond his mandate then we will look into this matter."

Opinion

Editorial

Deadly classrooms
Updated 16 Oct, 2026

Deadly classrooms

Parents should not have to become structural engineers to judge whether their children are safe at school.
Diplomatic options
16 Oct, 2026

Diplomatic options

AS Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Houthi movement continue to trade fire, and the US-Iran war is locked in a stalemate,...
Hunger in Pakistan
16 Oct, 2026

Hunger in Pakistan

PAKISTAN’S position as the country most affected by hunger in South Asia is not surprising. An economy battered by...
Lagging behind
Updated 15 Oct, 2026

Lagging behind

The immediate task is to contain inflation and protect vulnerable households without reviving unsustainable subsidies or excessive demand.
India voter purge
Updated 15 Oct, 2026

India voter purge

Earlier, the BJP and its Hindutva cohorts could get away with trampling the rights of Indian Muslims, but now their shenanigans are not working.
Multan derailment
15 Oct, 2026

Multan derailment

IN numerous states, including many of Pakistan’s neighbours, rail transport is a safe and affordable mode of...