Reviewing CPEC

Published
0

LATELY there have been discussions in the media, especially a remark attributed to a minister who has stated that China- Pakistan Economic Corridor needed to be reviewed.

Those who are propagating unnecessary fear and despair by arguing that Pakistan would become so entrapped in debt burden that it would lose its economic sovereignty and forced to cede its territory i.e. Gwadar port-to-China are sadly mistaken. However, we also need to look at parallel developments elsewhere.

Debate in Myanmar now focuses on plans for a $7.3 billion deep water port at Kyaukphyu on the Bay of Bengal. Western economists struggle to see what Myanmar gains from Kyaukphyu, which is far from the country’s commercial capital, Yangon. They have no trouble seeing what China gets: an opening to the sea for its landlocked south-western province of Yunnan.

They point to the precedent of Hambantota, a port built by China in Sri Lanka that passed into Chinese hands in 2017, along with 69 square kilometres of land, after the Sri Lankan government could not service debts incurred in its construction. Former Sri Lankan officials have told the New York Times of other, secret Chinese terms, for instance a demand to share intelligence about all traffic through the port.

Immediately, China does not systematically report lending overseas, which heightens the mystery and unease about goals that may stretch well beyond the economic.

Money spent building coal-fired power stations, notably in Pakistan, is also a concern.

In March 2018, the Centre for Global Development published a paper naming eight countries at high risk of debt distress, including Pakistan.

During a visit to Beijing in August, Malaysia’s Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said his country would shelve three China-backed projects, including a $20bn railway.

The above analysis shows that CPEC projects are most likely to bring positive economic and social benefits to Pakistan, provided we strengthen our response and absorptive capacity in terms of business model, institutions, policies and transparency. As such a review is quite necessary by the present government in consultation with Chinese authorities.

Shahab Afroz Khan

Karachi

Published in Dawn, September 28th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Makkah pact clarity
22 Oct, 2026

Makkah pact clarity

THERE had been much speculation about what exactly the trilateral Makkah Joint Defence Agreement entails, other than...
Common ground
22 Oct, 2026

Common ground

IT appears that the PML-N, echoing the PPP’s recent offer, is also willing to re-engage with the opposition, at...
The treatment gap
22 Oct, 2026

The treatment gap

A BREAST cancer diagnosis no longer carries the bleak outlook it did a generation ago. Targeted medicines,...
Real FBR reform
21 Oct, 2026

Real FBR reform

REFORM of the FBR has always been easier to promise than to deliver. Since the late 1990s, governments have tried...
Missing lawmakers
Updated 21 Oct, 2026

Missing lawmakers

Some lawmakers have reportedly been in detention since before Oct 11.
Tackling rabies
21 Oct, 2026

Tackling rabies

RABIES is a deadly but preventable zoonotic disease. On Monday, two more victims succumbed to it in Sindh, taking ...