Marjayoun: Supporters of Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Amal Movement celebrate their parties victory on the road.—Reuters
Marjayoun: Supporters of Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Amal Movement celebrate their parties victory on the road.—Reuters

BEIRUT: Lebanon’s Iran-backed Hezbollah claimed victory on Monday after elections it said legitimised its military branch, leaving Saudi-backed Prime Minister Saad Hariri as the main loser.

The two main protagonists of the country’s first legislative polls in almost a decade did not wait for official results to comment on the implications of a vote which was also marked by low turnout.

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah called the vote “a great political and moral victory for the resistance option that protects the sovereignty of the country”.

The Iran-backed Shia movement and its allies look set to secure a parliament bloc large enough to thwart attempts for it to disarm, a longstanding de­­mand of its political enemies.

“The make-up of the new legislative chamber represents a guarantee and a great strength to protect this strategic choice and to protect the golden equation — the army, the people and the resistance,” Nasrallah said.

The man who has led calls internally for Hezb­ollah to lay down its arms is Hariri, whose Sunni-domi­nated Future Movement — less dominant since it lost Saudi Arabia’s lavish support — lost a third of its seats.

Hariri told reporters his party had won 21 seats, a drop from the 33 it controlled in the outgoing legislature. “We were betting on a better result,” the premier said.

The number of Hezbollah lawmakers in the 128-seat parliament may not increa­­se from the current 13 but astute pre-electoral tactics have secured it enough allies to withstand challenges on strategic issues.

“Hariri’s loss will be the distinguishing mark of these elections, which will have consequences on the battle to form a new government,” the pro-Hezbollah Al-Akhbar daily wrote earlier on Monday.

Hezbollah, which was created in the 1980s to fight against Israel and currently battles in Syria alongside regime forces, is listed as a terror organisation by the United States.

The group, whose arsenal outguns the army’s does not derive its dominant status on the Lebanese scene from the ballot box but the new breakdown of parliament will increase its political legitimacy.

Lebanon’s unique brand of sectarian-driven, power-sharing politics mean rival factions often end up in the same government, as is the case now where Hezbollah is represented in Hariri’s cabinet.

The constitution stipulates that parliament is equally split between Mus­lims and Christians, whose biggest party, led by President Michel Aoun has been a Hezbollah ally.

“The biggest swing vote will be President Aoun’s group, which will move among the other blocs. Hezbollah will benefit from the lack of a broad coalition against it,” political analyst Imad Salamey said.

Lawmakers had exten­ded their own mandate three times since 2009, ostensibly over security concerns linked to the war in neighbouring Syria and political divisions that led to long and crippling institutional crises.

Civil society

A higher turnout than the 49.2 per cent announced overnight had been expected after the long electoral hiatus but the new pre-printed ballots used on Sunday appeared to confuse some voters.

Some voters also said the sometimes absurd web of local alliances that saw some parties work together in one district and compete in others had put them off.

Senior political leaders, including Hariri himself and Interior Minister Nohad Machnouk whose task it was to supervise the vote, admitted that new voting rules tested for the first time had been perplexing for the electorate.

Despite the disappointing turnout among an electorate that included around 800,000 people who were too young to vote in the previous general polls, the new electoral law that allows smaller parties to run helped a civil society list break into parliament.

At least one of two wom­en in the movement was expected to enter parliam­ent, where they have ple­dged to extend their feisty campaign against political dynasties they charge are incompetent, self-serving and corrupt.

Published in Dawn, May 8th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...