Reporting in Kabul

Published
8

ONCE again, life came to a standstill in parts of Afghanistan after a series of devastating attacks: twin suicide bombings in the capital, followed by another attack in Kandahar, and a shooting in Khost.

The Afghan Taliban’s annual spring offensive may have technically begun only a few days ago, but for ordinary Afghans there had never been any let up — especially not with an emboldened militant Islamic State group escalating the state of terror, as both outfits vie against each other with increasing brutality.

Yesterday’s IS-claimed attack in the heavily fortified heart of the capital dealt a deadly blow to its already beleaguered press corps; nine journalists — another journalist died in a separate incident in Khost — were killed by a second bomber, disguised as one of them, as they rushed to the scene of the first bombing.

The horror of the enemy in plain sight is not an unknown phenomenon to Kabul — in March last year, IS gunmen (some dressed as doctors) stormed a military hospital, while the Taliban claimed the shocking ambulance bombing earlier this year.

Still, the tactic of targeting emergency first responders, volunteers and journalists in a secondary attack is a grisly escalation of the violence which the Afghan government seems helpless to contain.

We grieve for journalists in Afghanistan, who even prior to this dark day were no strangers to such tragedy.

There have been several attacks on TV stations in recent years, and Reporters without Borders documented the death of at least 15 media workers in Afghanistan in 2017.

Reporting itself has become more difficult, as pressure from insurgents has created ‘information black holes’ and prompted many women to leave the profession.

The necessity of unrestricted and extensive reporting (especially of underrepresented voices) cannot be stressed enough.

Yet, being the first to cover a newsworthy event is never worth losing one’s life for.

The Afghan media might note, for example, how here in Pakistan we responded to the issue of secondary targeted attacks by establishing consensus to maintain a safe distance from bomb sites until law enforcement arrives and secures the area.

There is another reason to be circumspect about such coverage; terrorists thrive on media attention, and a strong correlation has been found between sensationalist reporting on terror-related incidents and follow-up attacks.

But a time lag is only a precaution, not a guarantee of safety, as it becomes clearer day by day that for peace and security to return to Afghanistan, Kabul must initiate talks on a political settlement.

Published in Dawn, May 1st, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Farewell to arms?
Updated 03 Aug, 2026

Farewell to arms?

PALESTINIAN resistance group Hamas recently made a major concession by agreeing to give up its weapons. It should be...
Unplanned future
03 Aug, 2026

Unplanned future

A PROJECTION that Pakistan’s population could reach 400m by 2040 should not be treated as another dramatic number...
No more torture
03 Aug, 2026

No more torture

EVEN the best laws on the books are worth little unless the state shows the willingness to enforce them. This is...
Urban flooding
Updated 02 Aug, 2026

Urban flooding

THE warning from the disaster management and weather authorities that a new monsoon spell could trigger urban...
Fatal workplaces
02 Aug, 2026

Fatal workplaces

THE methane explosion near Quetta that killed 34 coal miners is the latest entry in Pakistan’s long register of...
Dual standards
02 Aug, 2026

Dual standards

IT appears that the Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party has fallen foul of the Election Commission of Pakistan. A...