LAHORE: India’s official stance on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) looks to be limited to one point that raises concerns over its route. That’s why India has taken a position on the growing presence of China in Pakistan in form of the CPEC, terming the multibillion dollars project as passing through the disputed territory.

This was stated by French researcher and analyst Fredric Grare while speaking at a session, titled “India Turns East: US-China Rivalry” at the ThinkFest (Afkar-i-Taza) at Alhamra on Saturday.

“A general feeling amid concerns on the CPEC prevails in India. And a similar feeling prevails in Pakistan that states that India is opposing the CPEC,” added Mr Grare.

While responding to other queries, he was of the view Pakistan was required to look at resources to regulate framework that would enable private sector/companies to have a competitive environment in the CPEC projects.

“I do agree the CPEC would generate massive employment for Pakistani people besides other economic benefits to this country. But my question is whether it meets your requirement regarding employment for your population,” he remarked.

He said Pakistan’s foreign policy needs clarity in view of the CPEC’s domestic political dynamics, political stability and its socioeconomic impact on the country. “You also need to have a viable strategy regarding transfer of technology to your companies in various sectors,” he opined.

Mr Grare said the civil unrest in the province of Balochistan was a local issue and not the international one.

Speaking on the occasion, Dr Musadik Malik, former special assistant to prime minister for water and power, termed the CPEC as employment intensive, creating jobs for hundreds of thousands for Pakistani youth.

“We are really very calculated on the CPEC as we believe that it would provide jobs to our youth,” he added.

“Pakistan is very clear on the CPEC as both the countries (China and Pakistan) have points of view close to each other’s which are not based on the views of other countries (US, India, Europe),” he added.

Published in Dawn, January 14th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...