The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday refused to issue a stay order against a Lahore High Court (LHC) order for the repatriation of three sugar mills believed to be owned by the Sharif family.

In December 2006, through a notification, the Punjab government had banned the establishment of new sugar mills and the expansion of existing mills. The prohibition included the relocation of mills as well.

However, in 2015, the provincial government had amended the 2006 notification to allow relocation. This revision led to the relocation of Chaudhry Sugar Mills to Rahim Yar Khan, Haseeb Waqas Sugar Mills to Muzaffargarh and Ittefaq Sugar Mills to Bahawalpur.

In 2016, however, former Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf secretary general Jahangir Tareen had challenged the relocation of mills in the LHC.

In Septemeber 2017, the high court had declared the relocations illegal and ordered that the owners of the mills return to their previous locations within three months.

The LHC's decision was soon challenged by mill owners in the apex court.

A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Mian Saqib Nisar has been hearing the petition.

The representatives of cane growers and counsels for mills owned by the Sharif family had told the bench that growers have been unable to sell their produce due to the suspension of sugar mills' operations. They had also requested that the bench issue a stay on the LHC's order so that the mills can resume crushing.

The defence lawyer, Aitzaz Ahsan, who is representing Tareen, had, however, insisted that the mills be relocated as per the LHC's verdict.

The CJP, in response, put forward two options to resolve the matter: either the cane be crushed after paying a commission to crushers, or that the entire produce that, according to the prosecution is rotting, is bought by Tareen.

Justice Nisar said that until the dilemma of cane growers is resolved, he will hold in-chamber hearings on the petition every day.

He also asked Ahsan to submit his recommendations for a resolution of the matter.

The next hearing has been scheduled for January 11.

Opinion

Poll language
17 Apr 2021

Poll language

There is a distinction between angry rhetoric and the language of the gutter.
Exempt from accountability?
17 Apr 2021

Exempt from accountability?

PM Khan has done a disservice to Pakistan by exempting certain institutions from performance requirements.
Education disrupted
Updated 16 Apr 2021

Education disrupted

The cost of not doing anything about them in terms of learning losses and dropouts are going to be very large.

Editorial

17 Apr 2021

Pak-India mediation

QUESTIONS had been swirling about what and who has prompted the latest detente between Pakistan and India. Now, it...
17 Apr 2021

Energy exploration

SOME exploration and production companies want the government to prioritise offshore exploration — a high-risk...
17 Apr 2021

Professor’s removal

IN a step that will go far in sending a message of reassurance to female students and academic staff in ...
Ban is no answer
Updated 16 Apr 2021

Ban is no answer

The ban will not dilute the narrative that fuels the party, it may even fan it.
16 Apr 2021

Slow recovery

THE pace of growth in large-scale manufacturing output continues to slow down, with LSM production contracting by...
16 Apr 2021

Ramazan profiteering

WITH the month of Ramazan underway, people have begun to feel the effects of galloping inflation even more. Prices...