HYDERABAD: A division bench of Sindh High Court’s Hyderabad circuit on Tuesday issued notices to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), Sindh Assembly Speaker Agha Siraj Durrani and others for Nov 20 on two identical petitions seeking disqualification of the speaker over his recent remarks which the petitioners said were against sanctity of vote.

Petitioners Ali Nawaz, Zulfikar Halepoto, Seema Naz and Rukhsana Kousar were represented in court by Advocate Bhagwandas and petitioner Ashraf Ali Noonari by Advocate Ali Palh.

Advocate Bhagwandas pleaded that the conduct of Agha Siraj Durrani fell in the purview of Article 113 of the Constitution. He submitted in court that the purpose of Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution was to guard the house of the chosen representatives of people so that its sanctity, honour and prestige was not tarnished.

He informed court that a video uploaded on social media on Oct 13 showed the Sindh Assembly speaker telling people that he would urinate on vote of people. He said that such remarks hurt people.

The counsel said that the lawmaker was elected on a ticket of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) founded by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who always believed in the power of vote.

They asked the court to direct the Shikarpur district election commissioner to notify Mr Durrani’s disqualification and restrain him from holding the office of the assembly speaker.

Counsel Ali Palh also prayed to court to order disqualification of Mr Durrani for using abusive language against voters of Sindh.

He said that the ECP should be directed to notify his disqualification as a member of the provincial assembly.

He informed court that Mr Durrani while speaking to people in a village remarked that he would urinate on votes.

He said that the video clip of his remarks went viral on social media and got publicity in the electronic media as well.

He said that the ECP and Provincial Election Commissioner (PEC) did not take any action against him.

He contended that under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution, Mr Durrani stood disqualified because he did not bear a good character.

Published in Dawn, October 18th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Collective security
Updated 12 Mar, 2026

Collective security

ERASING previously defined ‘red lines’, the brutal US-Israeli war on Iran has brought regional states face to...
Spectrum leap
12 Mar, 2026

Spectrum leap

THE sale of 480 MHz of fifth-generation telecom spectrum for $507m is a major milestone in Pakistan’s digital...
Toxic fallout
12 Mar, 2026

Toxic fallout

WARS can leave environmental scars that remain long after the fighting is over. The strikes on Iran’s oil...
Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...