California challenges Trump's end to young immigrant programme

Published September 12, 2017
Thousands of immigrants and supporters join the Defend DACA March to oppose the US President Trump's order to end DACA on September 10, 2017 in Los Angeles, California. —AFP
Thousands of immigrants and supporters join the Defend DACA March to oppose the US President Trump's order to end DACA on September 10, 2017 in Los Angeles, California. —AFP

California sued the Trump administration on Monday over its decision to end a programme that gives protection from deportation to young immigrants brought to the United States illegally as children or by parents who overstayed visas.

The lawsuit's legal arguments largely mirror those already filed in a lawsuit last week by 15 other states and the District of Columbia.

California's Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he was joined in his suit by the attorney generals for Maryland, Maine and Minnesota. The lawsuit alleges the Trump Administration violated the Constitution and other laws when it rescinded the programme.

The lawsuit makes largely procedural arguments, including that federal law requires that such decisions be made for sound reasons and only after the public has a chance to make formal comments.

It said the administration also failed to follow a federal law requiring it to consider negative effects of the decision on small businesses.

It also cites the Fifth Amendment's due process guarantee in warning that the administration and immigration officials could use information provided by programme participants to deport them and prosecute their employers.

The suit said that would amount to misusing sensitive information that was provided in good faith by programme participants.

Becerra told The Associated Press last week that California would file its own lawsuit because more than 200,000 of the 800,000 participants in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals programme live in the state and that California would be the state hit hardest by the end of the programme.

But the lawsuit mirrors a suit already filed in New York by 15 states and the District of Columbia. Plaintiffs include New York, Massachusetts, Washington, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Virginia.

The University of California has also filed a legal challenge to ending the programme.

US Attorney General Jeff Session announced last week that new applications for the programme are being halted and that it will end in six months if Congress does not take action.

Sessions said President Barrack Obama's creation of the programme without Congressional approval was “an unconstitutional exercise of authority.” But the states' lawsuit says the administration still must follow federal procedural laws if it wants to end the programme.

Opinion

Editorial

Taxing pensions
Updated 11 May, 2024

Taxing pensions

Tax reforms have failed to deliver because of distortions created by the FBR bureaucracy through SROs, apparently for personal gains.
Orwellian slide
11 May, 2024

Orwellian slide

IN recent years, Pakistan has made several attempts at introducing an overarching mechanism through which to check...
Terror against girls
11 May, 2024

Terror against girls

ONCE again, the ogre of terrorism is seeking the sacrifice of schoolgirls. On Wednesday, just days after the...
Enrolment drive
Updated 10 May, 2024

Enrolment drive

The authorities should implement targeted interventions to bring out-of-school children, especially girls, into the educational system.
Gwadar outrage
10 May, 2024

Gwadar outrage

JUST two days after the president, while on a visit to Balochistan, discussed the need for a political dialogue to...
Save the witness
10 May, 2024

Save the witness

THE old affliction of failed enforcement has rendered another law lifeless. Enacted over a decade ago, the Sindh...