KARACHI: The Pakistan Peoples Party has decided to file three appeals against the recent court decision in the Benazir Bhutto assassination case. The appeals will be filed by Latif Khosa on behalf of PPP co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari.

The party has also decided that in the Zulfikar Ali Bhutto reference, the executed former prime minister’s grandson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, to be represented by Senator Farooq Naek, would seek to become a party.

These decisions were made at a party meeting held at Bilawal House and presided over by PPP’s chairman Mr Bhutto-Zardari and co-chairman Zardari.

During the meeting, the PPP’s legal team briefed the party high command on different legal aspects of the Benazir murder case verdict.

Prominent among those who attended the meeting were Faryal Talpur, Syed Khursheed Shah, Yusuf Raza Gilani, Syed Qaim Ali Shah, Nayyar Bukhari, Latif Khosa, Senator Naek, Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah, Aitzaz Ahsan, Farhatullah Babar and Sherry Rehman.

Speaking at a press conference after the meeting, Mr Khosa said the PPP leadership had certain reservations on the judgement in the Benazir murder case and, therefore, it had decided to file three appeals against the decision.

Mr Khosa said that one of the appeals would be filed against the acquittal of the accused by Rawalpindi’s antiterrorism court, the second against former military ruler president Pervez Musharraf and the third appeal would challenge the conviction of the two senior police officials.

About the appeal to be filed against retired Gen Musharraf, Mr Khosa said, he was an absconder in the Benazir murder case and the court was not bound to wait for an absconder (to reach a decision). The court could arrange a lawyer for Gen Musharraf on government expense although Barrister Farogh Naseem was his attorney.

Mr Khosa said: “We have grievances against former interior minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan for allowing Pervez Musharraf to escape from the country.

“Nawaz Sharif and Chaudhry Nisar tried to put the blame for his escape on the Supreme Court which was totally wrong because the powers of placing somebody’s name on Exit Control List lie with the federal government.”

In reply to a question, he said that as the Benazir murder case trial had been completed, “we demand that in this case Pervez Musharraf should also be convicted”.

He said that security not was provided to Benazir Bhutto’s public meeting in Rawalpindi and for this Gen Musharraf — and not Saud Aziz — was responsible.

The order to wash the site of the crime was also given by higher authorities, said Mr Khosa.

Soon after the former prime minister’s assassination, he said, the interior ministry held Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsood responsible for the attack, on the instructions given by Gen Musharraf in a high-level meeting.

Mr Khosa said that the PPP would not let the blood of Ms Bhutto go to waste.

About the exonerated accused, he said Bilal and Ikramullah were would-be suicide bombers and they were facilitated by Shafqat Hussain and his colleague. The record of all these was available on the phone and the accused, after their arrest, had recorded their confessional statements before the court.

“We have also reservations over acquittal of three important accused and we would also file appeals against their acquittal.”

He said the conviction of police officials Saud Aziz and Khurram Shahzad was beyond comprehension and that was why they would also file an appeal against their conviction to meet the demand of justice.

Mr Khosa said all these clues led to “Pervez Musharraf’s neck”.

In reply to a question, Mr Khosa said that Z.A. Bhutto, who gave the country the Constitution and nuclear bomb, was implicated in a false case. This was conceded by two of the judges conducting his trial, which proved that Mr Bhutto’s execution was a ‘judicial murder’.

He said during the tenure of the last PPP government, Mr Zardari had filed the reference in the Supreme Court and now, being his heir, his son would seek to become intervener in the case.

In this case, Senator Naek would pursue the matter on behalf of Mr Bhutto-Zardari whileSenator Ahsan would represent Mr Zardari in the reference.

Published in Dawn, September 8th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Collective security
Updated 12 Mar, 2026

Collective security

Regional states need to sit down and talk. They must also pledge and work towards collective security.
Spectrum leap
12 Mar, 2026

Spectrum leap

THE sale of 480 MHz of fifth-generation telecom spectrum for $507m is a major milestone in Pakistan’s digital...
Toxic fallout
12 Mar, 2026

Toxic fallout

WARS can leave environmental scars that remain long after the fighting is over. The strikes on Iran’s oil...
Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...