Newly elected Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, in his maiden speech, talked about his economic vision while affirming a continuity of Nawaz Sharif’s policies.

The focus remains on expediting the ongoing development programme driven primarily by the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

At the centre of his discussion was the commitment to broaden the tax net by bringing every affluent individual — including those in the parliament — into it.

He was grieved at how a recent tax directory of parliamentarians showed that politicians were not working with sincerity. “Those who do not pay taxes and live a luxurious life will have to pay taxes now,” he declared.

Mr Abbasi also appealed to the people to pay their due taxes honestly, warning that he planned stern action against tax evaders and expected the rich to contribute their share to the national economy.

With slippages on non-tax revenue and lower than targeted tax collections, the fiscal deficit over the recently concluded fiscal year has been estimated at higher than 4.2pc of GDP — significantly greater than the 3.8pc target set by Mr Dar himself.

With slippages on non-tax revenue and lower than targeted collection, the fiscal deficit in 2016-17 has been estimated at higher than 4.2pc of GDP, significantly greater than the 3.8pc target

Alarmingly, with far reaching consequences, the total revenue-to-GDP-ratio has struggled to pick up. In fact, it has plummeted to 9.4pc in the first three quarters (July-March for which reconciled numbers are available) against 9.9pc of GDP in the same period last year. (Data for the full year is yet to be compiled)

But that is not all; the tax revenue for the same period struggled at 8pc of GDP compared to 8.3pc of GDP during the same period last year. Similarly, non-tax revenue also stood at 1.3pc of GDP compared to 1.6pc of last year.

This is despite the fact Finance Minister Dar had been taxing almost everything possible to increase revenues and showed improvements in absolute numbers.

The numbers show the hard earned gains, on the revenue front over the past four years, of removal of tax exemptions and purported reforms are on a reverse gear.

Such a realisation is upsetting at a time when the government is in the last leg of its tenure and unlikely to be able to show greater fiscal discipline.

It needs to be remembered that basic objective of tax reforms under the 3-year IMF programme was to expand tax base and reduce tax rates.

The government seems to have miserably failed on this count as the country has one of the highest sales tax rates at present and the tax base has not been expanded despite withdrawal of some tax exemptions.

In the process, the government changed the definition of surcharges and included them in ‘other taxes’ to show performance of the FBR and higher tax-to-GDP ratio.

Also, an attempt was made to bring the real estate sector under the effective tax net. The agriculture and services sectors were mostly outside the effective tax net even though these were central promises of the IMF programme and the 7th National Finance Commission Award.

No wonder then the IMF recently called for the need to go for fresh taxation measures worth around 1.5pc of GDP (almost Rs500 billion) during the current fiscal year.

In a rather adverse opinion, the IMF noted that policy implementation had weakened and macroeconomic vulnerabilities begun to re-emerge as fiscal consolidation slowed, the current account deficit widened, and foreign exchange reserves declined.

On the structural front, the accumulation of arrears in the power sector has resumed, financial losses of ailing public sector enterprises continue to weigh on scarce fiscal resources, and exports remain low.

Despite progress, poverty and inequality are still significant, and growth needs to become more inclusive, according to the IMF.

The IMF also pointed out that tax revenues were 0.6pc of GDP lower than expected, due to lower collection of sales tax including those through oil products, direct taxes, excises, and gas infrastructure development cess (GIDC).

In addition, non-tax revenues were 0.7pc of GDP lower than anticipated, due to lower SBP profits, PSEs’ dividends, and disbursements under the Coalition Support Fund.

The IMF “advised that significant additional tax policy and administrative measures of around 1.5pc of GDP may be needed to achieve the FY 2017/18 revenue objective, especially if this fiscal year’s (2016-17) revenue turns out lower than expected”.

The FBR has stood behind its collection target by Rs260bn by end of fiscal year although final numbers are still being reconciled.

The new tax measures in run up to next year’s budget and elections could include further reducing tax expenditures (estimated at 1.3pc of GDP in 2016/17), gradually raising petroleum taxes (the easiest route), further strengthening the system of withholding taxes for non-filers, and improving provincial tax collection in agriculture, property, and services.

These measures should be complemented by continued strong administrative efforts to improve tax compliance.

We will have to wait to see how Prime Minister Abbasi prevails upon his financial czar Ishaq Dar to make progress in these areas and expand the tax base ahead of his going into polls in June next year.

Published in Dawn, The Business and Finance Weekly, August 7th, 2017



Another U-turn?
Updated 07 Oct, 2022

Another U-turn?

The PTI’s decision to take back its resignations could herald a twist in the tussle playing out in Islamabad.
Renewed TTP threat
07 Oct, 2022

Renewed TTP threat

THE interior ministry’s call for ‘extreme vigilance’ and instructions to security forces to conduct ‘search...
Women’s gala in GB
07 Oct, 2022

Women’s gala in GB

REGRESSIVE forces, once again, nearly had their way — this time in Gilgit-Baltistan. A three-day sporting gala for...
‘Draconian’ law
06 Oct, 2022

‘Draconian’ law

THE debate over what it means to be ‘sadiq’ and ‘ameen’ has reignited after the incumbent Supreme Court ...
Welcome clarity
Updated 06 Oct, 2022

Welcome clarity

There needs to be consensus amongst all political actors that matters of governance should be the exclusive domain of civilians.
Car purchases
06 Oct, 2022

Car purchases

IF we are in the market to buy a new car, we end up paying a significantly large amount as premium over the sticker...