8
The following information is based on documents submitted to the Supreme Court by Imran Khan's legal counsel for the Panamagate hearing. The assertions made in these extracts are solely the view of the respondents. Dawn.com does not endorse or confirm the claims made in the case file.
The Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chief has accused Nawaz Sharif of having siphoned off millions in ill-gotten wealth from Pakistan to foreign bank accounts.
Here are some unusual takeaways from documents submitted by the PTI in court against PM Nawaz.
1. The 'evidence' was prefaced by these bombastic allegations:
2. A cartoon showing Nawaz Sharif as a '20th century Mughal prince':
3. All 196 pages of an Urdu book titled 'Raiwind Sazish':
4. These photos of an Airbus cockpit:
5. This literature on money laundering, tax evasion and favouritism:
Read more
On DawnNews
Comments (8) Closed
Dec 06, 2016 12:18pm
Supreme Court should reject irrelevant documents
Recommend
0
Dec 06, 2016 02:34pm
OMG! Not sure whether i should laugh or cry!
but I choose to laugh
Recommend
0
Dec 06, 2016 03:22pm
Shall we ever become able to stop such nonsense? if yes, its gonna be very difficult and time taking!
Recommend
0
Dec 06, 2016 03:23pm
if that's all it takes to convict someone than with these kind of evidences we can prove a lot of wrong doings by all politicians and others.
Recommend
0
Dec 06, 2016 04:11pm
There are some irrelevant documents but no like other who are saying we submitted the wrong photocopy.
Recommend
0
Dec 06, 2016 06:47pm
PTI, oh, PTI instead of becoming laughing stock please do something praise worthy in KPK so we may consider you seriously for 2018 elections!
Recommend
0
Dec 07, 2016 02:12am
As a former California deputy attorney general, I am appalled at the nonsense included in the PTI documents. I have occasionally seen the same in submissions to our appellate courts, but always felt safe in ignoring them because I knew the courts would do so also, knowing their impropriety without need for my objection. To submit irrelevant material to a court for the purpose of influencing the court through inadmissible evidence is thoroughly improper.
imho.
Recommend
0
Dec 07, 2016 12:27pm
Now I know why he wouldn't be a PM anytime !
Recommend
0
