ISLAMABAD: An Islamabad district and sessions judge has attached the luxurious Chak Shahzad farmhouse belonging to former president retired Gen Pervez Musharraf in a high treason case, as the special court trying the case has declared him an absconder.

A three-judge special court headed by Peshawar High Court Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel on July 19 declared Mr Musharraf an absconder, and ordered the confiscated of his movable and immovable properties.

According to details about Mr Musharraf’s properties submitted to the special court by the Ministry of Interior, the former dictator owns seven immovable properties and nine bank accounts.

The immovable properties include the Chak Shahzad farmhouse, land in the Army Housing Scheme in Karachi, Khayaban-i-Faisal, Defence Housing Authority (DHA) Karachi, Beach Street, DHA Islamabad and DHA Lahore.


Former dictator’s Chak Shahzad farmhouse is sub judice, ownership claimed by spouse


Mr Musharraf also operates nine bank accounts in Bank Alfalah, Askari Bank, Habib Metropolitan Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and the National Bank of Pakistan.

The farmhouse mentioned in the interior ministry’s details is disputed, since the matter is sub judice. Mr Musharraf’s wife, Sehba Musharraf, claims ownership of the house, which she says her husband gifted to her in 2008.

District and Sessions Judge (East) Islamabad Sohail Ikram, in pursuance of the special court’s order, held that “complaint No.01 of 2013 (regarding high treason) has been made before us that accused General (retired) Pervez Musharraf… has committed the offence of high treason…[and] is intentionally avoiding the execution of arrest warrants and as per available record has left the country”.

The judge’s order stated that “a proclamation has been issued and published required General (retired) Pervez Musharraf... to appear and answer the complaint till July 12, 2016”.

The order says that since Mr Musharraf has failed to comply with repeated notices from the special court, properties under his possession are liable to be attached.

Commenting on the attachment of properties, Faisal Hussain – a member of Mr Musharraf’s legal team – said the matter is already sub judice, and so Ms Musharraf may challenge the order.

He said that on July 19, the special court had allowed for disputed regarding properties belonging to the suspect to be challenged at the appropriate forum.

Published in Dawn November 17th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Lessons from history
Updated 24 May, 2025

Lessons from history

Is it apt for PM Shehbaz to describe the recent thwarting of India’s hostile designs as revenge for the loss of East Pakistan?
Business sentiment
24 May, 2025

Business sentiment

THE recent macroeconomic stability — its vulnerability to potential internal slippages and external shocks...
Sindh protests
24 May, 2025

Sindh protests

WEEKS after locals blocked off major arteries in Sindh to protest a proposal to build new canals on the Indus,...
Regional bonhomie
Updated 23 May, 2025

Regional bonhomie

Trilateral cooperation and commercial activity can lead to prosperity for all involved, specifically Afghanistan.
Local government bill
23 May, 2025

Local government bill

THE PML-N leadership is known for concentrating powers in the hands of the top political office and governing ...
New normal?
Updated 23 May, 2025

New normal?

WHY can’t the PTI and its jailed leader decide what they want? Even while leverage is slipping from its hands, the...