No lockdown, PTI can only hold sit-in at designated place: IHC

Published October 31, 2016
Pakistani opposition politician Imran Khan speaks with party leaders at his home in Bani Gala, outside Islamabad, ─Reuters
Pakistani opposition politician Imran Khan speaks with party leaders at his home in Bani Gala, outside Islamabad, ─Reuters

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday reiterated its earlier order that the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) should hold its planned sit in at 'Democracy Park and Speech Corner’, located near Islamabad's Parade Ground in Shakarparian and ordered the PTI chief to appear in court.

The PTI said it would challenge the court's order in the apex court.

PTI's Shah Mahmood Qureshi claimed, "As Justice Siddiqui is related to Irfan Siddiqui, the prime minister's adviser, it would be better if he did not hear the case."

"We have already asked our lawyers to prepare the petition saying we don't think the judge should hear this case... And we will present it in the Supreme Court tomorrow," he said, speaking to the press outside Imran Khan's Bani Gala residence in Islamabad.

The IHC order came after Imran Khan asked the Supreme Court to take suo motu notice of arrests of his party's workers while speaking to the media outside Bani Gala.

During an earlier press conference, Imran Khan told the media that he had already spoken to the judge and would not go to court.

Taking issue with this statement, Justice Siddiqui asked "Why did Imran say that he would not appear before the court and that he had talked to judge?".

The IHC asked that the chief present himself within 10 minutes.

Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, while hearing a case regarding the PTI sit in, remarked "Is only Imran Khan respectable in this country?"

The judge ordered the inspector general Islamabad to make arrangements for Imran Khan to be presented in court.

"I want to ask Justice Siddiqui, that when you made a decision and passed an order permitting us to hold a peaceful protest, and said that containers will not be placed, then why are our activists in jail?" the chief had said on Saturday during a press conference.

Justice Siddiqui, responding to the Imran's comment, asked today, "Is this a way to talk, saying 'Justice Siddiqui see how your order is being treated'?"

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...