PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Tuesday stopped the National Accountability Bureau from probing the charge of the misuse of office against chief engineer of communication and works department, Zahid Arif, engineer Sohail Bin Qayyum, and former chief secretary Sahibzada Riaz Noor.

A bench consisting of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Justice Irshad Qaiser also ordered the quashing of the issuance of call-up notices to the suspects, who moved the court against the NAB moves.

The bench had reserved the verdict few days ago after the completion of arguments by the relevant lawyers.

Petitioner Zahid Arif was arrested by the NAB on the charge of possessing illegal assets and was freed in 2000 after he had entered into plea bargain with the bureau and paid Rs17 million to it.

At that time, he was an assistant director in the communication and works department.


Call-up notices issued to three suspects over ‘misuse of office’ also quashed


The NAB executive board had authorised an inquiry in 2013 regarding the re-instatement of Zahid Arif and about the non-filing of an appeal by the provincial government in the Supreme Court to challenge a decision of the services tribunal which had ordered his re-instatement to service.

Arshad Ali, Barrister Mudassir Amir and Aamir Jawed, lawyers for the petitioners, said initially, the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, didn’t have any provision suggesting that a suspect would cease to hold a public office after he entered into plea bargain with the NAB.

They said in 2001, an amendment was made to Section 15 of the NAB law stating soon after entering into plea bargain, the accused would cease to hold public offices.

The lawyers said there was no provision of disqualification at that time but even then, Zahid Arif was dismissed from service and that the services tribunal had ordered his re-instatement afterwards.

They said petitioner Sohail Bin Qayyum was appointed an inquiry officer to look into corruption allegations against Zahid Arif, but the inquiry didn’t find anything.

The lawyers said the NAB had ordered inquiry and investigation against the petitioners and also issued call-up notices to them.

They said appeal against the judgment of the services tribunal was not filed as the law department and advocate general office had suggested that the case was not fit for appeal.

The lawyers requested the bench to quash the start of inquiry against their clients and declare the issuance of call-up notices to them illegal.

Published in Dawn, February 17th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...
Iran’s new leader
Updated 10 Mar, 2026

Iran’s new leader

The position is the most powerful in Iran, bringing together clerical authority and political and ideological leadership.
National priorities
10 Mar, 2026

National priorities

EVEN as the country faces heightened risks of attacks from actual terrorists, an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi...
Silenced march
10 Mar, 2026

Silenced march

ON the eve of International Women’s Day, Islamabad Police detained dozens of Aurat March activists who had ...