Indian Army opposes govt’s plan for border embankments

Published October 8, 2015
Indian Army sees the move as a potential obstruction to its movements.—Reuters/File
Indian Army sees the move as a potential obstruction to its movements.—Reuters/File
NSA Ajit Doval is grappling with a face-off between the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and the army. —Creative Commons
NSA Ajit Doval is grappling with a face-off between the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and the army. —Creative Commons

NEW DELHI: Embank­ments along the India-Pakistan working boundary in Jammu, protested by Pakistan as an illegal wall, have been objected to by the Indian Army as a potential obstruction to its movements, The Hindu said on Wednesday.

It said National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval is grappling with a face-off between the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and the army.

“The army has objected to the government’s plan to build a raised embankment along the 179-km stretch of the international border (IB) in Jammu district,” a senior Home Ministry official told The Hindu.

Know more: India converting LoC into quasi border, UN told

The plan for the embankment (better known as ditch-cum-bund) was cleared in 2013 by the then UPA government after the twin terror attacks in the Hiranagar/Samba sector the same year. Around 20 per cent land has been acquired for the project, being implemented by the MHA. The raised embankment will be constructed under the supervision of the Border Security Force (BSF).

However, at a recent meeting between Army Chief General Dalbir Singh and Mr Doval, the government has been asked to rethink the entire project, the paper said.

Also read: Indian BSF denies Pakistan's quasi-border claims

“The army believes that in case of an emergency, this embankment will affect their operations and restrict their forward movement. The army already mans another embankment, a few kilometres behind the IB,” the paper quoted a senior MHA official as saying.

Another official said the BSF had also been asked to submit a detailed report on why the project should go ahead.

A final decision will be taken by the Prime Minister’s Office and the proposal is pending with the Cabinet Committee on Security.

According to the Indian version, the Jammu sector has witnessed 589 ceasefire violations from Pakistan’s side since May 2014, when the NDA government came to power, till August 20 this year.

The same period saw 95 infiltration attempts from the Jammu border, the paper said evidently giving the Indian count.

Pakistan’s version is rarely cited in Indian media.

According to the paper, this is the same project over which Pakistan complained to the UN Security Council a few days ago. Pakistan’s Ambassador to UN Maleeha Lodhi, in a letter to the President of the Security Council, Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, alleged that India was planning to construct a ‘wall’ along the border, which it called a working boundary, to convert it “into a quasi international border”.

Published in Dawn, October 8th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

WITH the country confronting one of its gravest economic crises, it is time for the government and business ...
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...