LONDON: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said on Saturday that sooner or later India would have to consider the four-point peace proposal he presented at the United Nations General Assembly.
Talking to journalists at the airport here before leaving for Pakistan, the prime minister said he had raised all relevant issues in his speech at the UN assembly and given concrete proposals for their resolution so as to reduce tensions between the two countries.
He said that proxy war against Pakistan from across the border should come to an end.
Mr Sharif said Pakistan had the evidence of involvement of Indian spy agency RAW in subversive activities and had shared it with the United Nations. He was confident that the dossiers Pakistan handed over to the UN would have considerable impact.
In reply to a question, he said the international community was listening to Pakistan’s stance on Kashmir and peace could not be achieved by hurling allegations.
He said tension in the region had affected the development process and there was no other method to resolve the outstanding issues except dialogue.
Mr Sharif said both Pakistan and India needed to adopt a balanced approach towards resolution of the issues. The sooner the dialogue process started the better it would be for the two countries.
Published in Dawn, October 4th, 2015
On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play
Read more
Comments (159) Closed
Oct 04, 2015 09:08am
Modi had already ignored what NS proposed.
Sushma made it clear what Pakistan is supposed to do in order to start the dialog. Better concentrate on doing that
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:12am
The problem is that Pakistan has to understand that India's stance will never be the same. India and Pakistan has in the recent years come close on two occasions and both the times India. Once in 1998-99 when Lahore Declaration happened. Which was derailed by Kargil War. Second was the building of trust and bilateral ties during 2004-2008 which saw a lot of improvement but then 26/11 happened and the only person caught alive was Kasab who hailed from Pakistan. These two incidents have hardened India's stance. Pakistan will needs to understand that it cannot play hardball with India anymore. Needs to make more soft approaches. I will say that Nawaz Shariff did that when he visited Modi's swearing in only to see very luke warm response from Modi. This is was a blunder by India but Pakistan also made a mistake by talking to separatists residing in India. India was right in saying that the negotiations have to be made between India and Pakistan. These separatists have no role.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:12am
Hope is conditional. Single item proposed by Sushamaji.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:18am
Hope PM NS considers 1 point proposal by Sushma Swaraj.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:19am
Didn't India already reply?
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:20am
Sir, principally I agree with you. There should be peace in this region and we should stop proxy war against each other. You asked India/RAW to stop interfering in pakistan but you have not mentioned about non state actors who are sitting inside pakistan and doing harm to India. Rememeber, it is always two way negotiataion. If you want peace for your country, please ensure peace for other country as well.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:21am
Apparently the only reason Pakistan is obsessed with Kashmir's situation is firstly, due to its ego-issue with India and secondly, Kashmir valley is Muslim-dominated. Out of these two, ego is a bigger problem. If it was 'Muslim' issue, one would hear Pakistan shed its 'crocodile tears' equally vociferously on Muslim world oppression and atrocities on Muslim populations by their own kind (fellow Muslims) rulers. Has anyone heard it? Afghanistan, Syria, South Turkey, Yemen, Iraq...for reference. Are these populations any lesser Muslims that do not deserve living in peace and not like refugees in non-Muslim countries? Please resolve that unfinished agenda first to establish even an iota of credibility in advocating on behalf of Kashmiris. India should continue to call off Pakistan's bluff
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:21am
Appreciate his optimism. NS if you were really calling the shots in Pakistan, we would have been discussing everything under the sun, including Kashmir. I am sure you would have really brought peace on the LOC and beyond.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:22am
Mr Sharif is wrong in his assessment India will never agree the terms given by the Pakistan did you ever heard of demilitarization ? How can they withdraw their troops from Siachin glacier.do you think they will with draw from Kashmir? If such happens next day Narender Modi Government will be gone Mr Sharif at this point India will never agree with any terms with Pakistan they are seeing another dream it will be the next silicon valley
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:25am
PM NS recent visit to UN was a great success,particularly on the background of ME crisis,his speech at UN was well balanced soft spoken but deep messaging,all are hopeful that India will come to table and resume talks.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:26am
NS held the dossier back to try to engage India bilaterally which they always whine about but India again showed insincerity. So that left NS no choice but to show the dossier privately to Intl partners. Indians mistakingly think that there is no evidence but there is, he was being diplomatic. At this time I think Modi has shown his true colours and intentions. To keep PK weak and forbid it from progressing.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:27am
Its quite obivious what Pakistan wants, but this is not the way to go and get it.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:28am
India foreign minister Sushma swaraj has given a one point solution for peace. It will be good if it is followed
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:30am
PM Sir, hope is not a strategy.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:31am
You're hopeful? India is a lost cause. Stop trying to talk with them.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:35am
Here in Multan, Punjab, Pakistan we want Greater Pakistan to extend all the way to Chennai. However people of Gujranwala, Punjab, Pakistan believe Greater Pakistan should overtake india and afghanistan when time is right. This is Pakistan.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:36am
India and Pakistan are like Harry Potter and
Voldemorte - neither can die while the other lives.
Unless Pakistani paranoia and insecurity as to its
identity can be resolved, there is no solution. And
now, it does not seem like a solution will happen,
either. Furthermore, the sceptre of terrorism will
ensure that this does not happen. As proof, a
terrorist was once asked, whether he will stop
fighting after realising Kashmir. Answer: No. The
monster unleashed is now too big to control... As
regards the people, with the rabidly Not-India
approach, and attempts to redefine its history, the
people are also steadily being driven apart. And
please remember, the educated and erudite few
who have risen above this are few in number as
compared to the large majority...
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:38am
thought India categorically rejected the peace proposal? is this a new one?
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:40am
Forget Kashmir and then we'll talk. Otherwise, please carry on with your life without bothering us.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:42am
Why should India accept giving Kashmir to Pakistan when it has defeated pakistan in all 4 wars on Kashmir ??? Pakistan has part of Kashmir n must focus on making lives better for that part....
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:42am
Balanced approach to give dossier to UN rather than waving it to the media to create drama.
Maybe India can learn something from Pakistan.
Hope Pakistan continues to expend energy for the betterment of its own country.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:45am
India might have considered the plan had NS proposed it straight to Modi instead of announcing it in the UN General Assembly, and had he not tried to sneak in UNMOGIP into his plan.
NS obviously came out desperately trying to internationalize the Kashmir issue, rather than genuinely seeking peace with India.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:46am
Sir, our FM already replied you. Till the time dust settles, let's focus on development issues.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:47am
So Mr NS means Pakistan will wait till India responds according to this 4 point agenda.so Pakistans peqce qnd development is in Indias hand.what poor strategy.
India has already replied to this four point agenda.and India want Pakistan to adopt its one piont agenda.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:49am
He is hurling allegations at India and then saying peace cannot be achieved by hurling allegations.......confusing statement by Mr. PM.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:52am
World is not fool that India signed multiple agreements for peace with Pak but Pak did not honor them. What is the point of taking when you keep changing your stand over and over again.
Pak must owner previous peace agreements.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:54am
@Hope India is superior anyway - financially, scientifically and technologically
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:06am
Peace process cannot be forced on India in UN, it should have been discussed with India in one on one discussion.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:07am
@Subhsubhbol exactly... I m not sure what he wants...neither any one.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:08am
Looking at the balance sheet and strategies by both countries, it is unlikely that a peaceful solution can be derived in near future. India has learnt to ignore Pakistan and it will continue to do so. Considering the intensity of animosity developing in political arena on both sides it is also unlikely that there will be peace in the region even if the K issue is solved.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:09am
India will never accept going back to the UN which will be against the Shimla agreement. Pakistan cannot have agreements and then keep going back and forward to wriggle out.Discussion has to be bilateral and devoid of the shadow of terror.The UN and the world is not interested in the dispute as they are more involved with economics where India has a more important role to play. Pakistan is at a great disadvantage there. The support it got during the cold war is no longer available and Pakistan has to fight its battle alone.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:12am
His peace plan. ..?
Sir let world know your 4 point plan is better or a single point plan referee by indian FM will meet the requirements
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:12am
We would not have been a nuclear power, if there there would not have been the core issue of Kashmir... what ever progress we have made we owe it to Kashmir...in my opinion our existences is due to this very fact.... or else we would have been disintegrated long time a go, considering the leadership had and have..Existence is a strange bargain. Life owes us little; we owe it everything. The only true happiness comes from squandering ourselves for a purpose....and the sole purpose should be humanity and not the piece of land...
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:14am
@Hope Pakistan is no hurdle. india is going ahead with improved bilateral relations with its other neighbours like Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. It has free trade with all these countries which has improved their economy and given them free access to a big Indian market and technology.Bangladesh currency has overtaken that of Pakistan and they are prospering with friendship with India.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:25am
Soon Pakistan will be irrelevant in the subcontinant. India made it amply clear and we are wasting our energy on the same line since decades. Saving Pakistan from internal turmoil and bringing people peace and properity should be the priority. India will never guve Kashmir.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:26am
@Saheb Nagori
India has been always ruled by OTHERS till 1947, only thing superior they have is there false ego. If India derails peace, it will be the biggest looser again.
Revolt will be from India internally, like always.
Good luck.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:27am
Modi is not a visionary statesman - a planted leader by corporate India to peruse their short-term agenda. Sad to see another opportunity being lost.
Issue of Kashmir should be solved and not to put at ransom prosperity of billions living in subcontinent.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:32am
Respected Prime Minister. India would absolutely love to live in peace with Pakistan. Not only than, perhaps even resolve Kashmir. After all, which developing country would want to waste billions on defense when the money can be used for better purposes. We don't doubt your intentions with us. Unfortunately, you are not in control of your own country. While a politician might want peace with India, the sad realty is that, only your military dictates foreign policy.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:36am
we need to cut all diplomatic ties with India and try to build relations with other neighbouring countries. we should be on one point agenda to work on our economic figures. Strategic power follows the economic power.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:46am
India would regret if they loose this opportunity to formulate a strategy of dialogue. Time is running fast - mark my words...
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:46am
India is busy with space program, digital India, start ups etc and maintaining economy growth rate of 7.5%. Do you think we have time or interest in so called subversive activities is Pakistan. Mr. Nawaz can use these gimmicks to fool his people but not rest of the world.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:51am
Both countries mimick each other.It seems that India is original, but then ultimately truth will prevail.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:54am
Perusal of comments has revealed that Indian friends are suppporting their Govt stance on NO ground. Friends just think with cool head the proposals are not bad. Do'nt reject merely that it was proposed by the P.M of Pakistan. Can'nt we peacefully live togather? Can'nt we solve our pre-partition pending issues amicably? Can'nt we spend more on education & prosperity besides billions of $ being spent on armaments? I do'nt know what we both would inherit to our comming generations. Hatered enimity? The repected Govt of India should must come over to discussion solve the vital issues including terrorism in both the sovereign states. The way to sucess is dialogue on every issue. Please do think to have a better, happy & secured future of both the neighbours
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:15am
Always hopeful and energetic my happy Pm.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:15am
The indians have started behaving like the Israelis....but Pakistan is not Palestine.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:15am
It is still true until this day as once Henry Kissinger said decades ago, India bleeding cuz Pakistan is a constant thorn in India's rib. ..... Indian politicians can't accept the fact that Pakistan is a reality and will not surrender to India instead the chances are It may even loose Kashmir not to mention khalistan and Assam. I don't think indian politicians are peace loving otherwise, they wouldn't have been involved in terrorists activities in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Assam, Kashmir, Nepal etc etc.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:24am
India has already conveyed firmly that terrorism and talks cannot go together.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:32am
So many comments by friends across the border depicts, PM succeeded to agitate their minds. Good going PM.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:36am
India forein minister Sushma Swaraj's speech was not relevant to current situations
in both countries, even it did not make sense to any one who knows the pros and coin.
She failed to offer alternative solution for peace in the region.
Indian teach their kids "We! Indian are superior in the world, technically, economically, culturally." They never tell truth that millions of homeless people sleep on the foot paths.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:39am
Enough foreign tours now concentrate on Pakistan which you care less
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:48am
I agree to all Indian commentators here, our PM should not be hopeful that Indian will ever think about peace in region; history says that too
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:51am
Don't expect any thing good from India as long as Modi's Govt. is there
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:52am
Enough for Kashmir issues when Pakistan has too many issues at home to resolve first. If this PM is really serious about Pakistan which i haven't seen yet
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 12:03pm
NS waiting for India's acceptance is not possible and hope this matter doesn't come to a standstill. So it is better to look for mutual understanding and it is peace the need of citizens of both the countries.
Hoping for the best. Good luck NS
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 12:04pm
Pakistan will not win on the negotiating table, what it couldnt win on the battlefield.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 12:08pm
@Rajeev Velagapudi We were just waiting for your FMs orders. This is not Bhutan or Nepal or Bangla Desh. This time we will hurt you and hurt you bad.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 12:18pm
NS Sir, true, Balanced approach by both India and Pakistan is required.
First both should be sensitive to each others stance.
1) For example, India should be sincere in resolving Kashmir issue. Should be soft to Pakistan. Share a good relationship with Pak. Pak/India should work together for Afgan issue. Should have cricketing ties.
2) Pakistan should be behave well. Why to upset India by talking to Kasmir separatists. India takes it as an offence. Can not Pakistan understand this much. If you want to talk to Kashmir, talk to elected govt of Kashmir.
If Pakistan knowingly doing this, then do not blame India for cancellation of talk, rather an introspection is the need of time for Pak and its intellectuals.
Kamal
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 12:24pm
After your speech it is not an international issue now its differed for centuries that one could lesser hope.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 12:31pm
Sincerity is lacking in resolving the issues. Pakistan should have accepted Ufa agreement between Modi and Nawaz to discuss terrorism only for now. That would have created goodwill and world opinion in favor of Pakistan. That would have also broken the ice so to speak. Who knows what would have happened next. There is no hard line or soft line. Modi is a doer. He would make things happen so development could happen in South Asia on his watch. Nawaz wants a resolution too but he will need to work with the boys. There is no such constraints with Modi.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 12:44pm
India is a bully country, interfering, spreading terrorism, indulging in subversive activities with its neighboring countries. Expecting peaceful and cordial relatios with India is like living in a fools paradise.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 12:57pm
@AReader respect... U have nailed it Sir
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 01:16pm
Two democracies do not go to war with one enother.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 01:23pm
@Rehan, a logical thought indeed
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 01:57pm
Will Pakistan demilitarize border areas with Afghanistan or Iran or China and answer is NO because your forces are defending integral parts of Pakistan same with India so why to even suggest such options
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 02:10pm
@Hope Really! Let's wait and see.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 02:13pm
If Pakistan sincerely want peace in the region, India should come up with a master stroke to have no war pact including the no first use of nuclear weapon.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 02:19pm
kashmir is will never become part of india it was never part of india and wil never be
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:08pm
Has India ever replied in affirmative?
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:09pm
@sandeep : Modi has no kidney to reply himself.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:14pm
@Rehan : Who was Kasab? Let me see another person in Pakistan with the same name, I will accept Indian stance.
It is clearly a fabricated name trying to spell Qasaab meaning butcher, the purported profession of the Indian captured and executed accused.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:16pm
@Indian Baba : The other option is war and Pakistan has already warned that, its nukes are not for Shab e Baraat fireworks!
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:25pm
@Saheb Nagori : But not morally and aesthetically.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:34pm
@Kitta.Indian Yes he did by submitting the dossier to the UN sec gen.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:35pm
@SRK : You are right. Even Gandhi said the same thing. But, Gandhi was assassinated for all his good sayings by a staunch Hindu RSS man Nathuram Godse. Modi is also a former RSS activist.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:38pm
@Rizwan : Defeat of India is evident from its rulers finding excuses under the arm-pits ! Otherwise, where are the Indian victory-anniversaries?
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:39pm
@Khwarezmi They do. Hitler was democratically elected and so is Modi.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 03:51pm
@Honest Liar , so true. I hope our hukumrans listens to this and send the army back to barracks and Raheel stops parading at every function that can be chaired and ceremonised by a district magistrate.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 04:03pm
To all Indians. Let's look at it logically and impartially shall we.
Pakistan has provided a 4 point proposal which in itself is a reply to Indian one point proposal. Here is how. Let's assume India is right and Pakistan is sending terrorists across the LoC. Pakistan has proposed to demilitarise Kashmir and LoC and have UN observe the LoC. shouldn't India welcome this as a reply to their one point agenda UNLESS of course the motive is something sinister which is exactly why India right away rejected all 4 points. You See India like Israel, both illegal occupiers, always find an excuse never to accept UN interference because this will expose their lies openly hence rubbishing their claim. This is the main reason why India gets all nervous about UN.
BTW ... Maoists have killed 100 times more Indians than the so called terrorists from Pakistan. Furthermore there are 1000's of unmarked graves in IO Kashmir discovered by HRW so not sure which terrorism Sushma Swaraj is referring to.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 04:14pm
@Rohit
We will be happy not to talk with India, but remember India will NEVER progress if the Kashmir issue remains unresolved!
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 04:24pm
Good way to fool your people..
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 04:47pm
Asking a simple question as to what does Pakistan want?
1. Independent and sovereign state of Jammu,Kashmir Ladakh,OR
2. Independent Kashmir valley, OR
3. Complete J&K as a part of Pakistan OR Valley only OR
4. State of J&K divided and distributed between India and Pakistan.
So the people can know what is the unfinished agenda to be negotiated on table.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 04:58pm
@Akil Akhtar
it is even worse.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:02pm
@COL VINOD That should be upto the Kashmiris to decide isn't it? This is what Pakistan wants. Do a plebiscite and let Kashmiris decide if they want to be with Pakistan, India or neither. Job done.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:03pm
Keeping hoping for another 25 years...
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:16pm
@Munir If that happens I can guarantee you there will be an immediate improvement in relations between the two countries.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:21pm
Seems the entire growth of Pakistan is halted by this kashmir business . If somthing dramatic happens in near future then this will be the exact moment this indian govt is hoping for . Nawaz Sharief has again failed as a statesman and speaks of some hope in some dark world , as though world will end if he can't get Kashmir .
Better prepare for the doomsday scenario and go for it instead of hoping . There is non to be exact .
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:38pm
Nawaz Sharif is sincere from the very start of his current term to repair his relations with the neighbouring country. But due to certain developments that happened, he gradually lost his grip on foreign policy viz- a- viz India. Presently the Army has restored its image and became very popular whereas the politicians have lost the confidence of the people. Actually the real power of running the country's affairs is in the hands of the Army. The army will never allow restoration of relation with arch enemy India unless the core issue of Kashmir is resolved.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:38pm
@Rajeev Velagapudi , would it means, Modi is a better leader than Mr. Ghandi? If you are stiff, you are politician. You are dictator. India has no choice but come to table.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:42pm
@Rehan , good and fair assessment. I believe Pakistan played stupid. If we are please, we must be honest and fair our dealing. If I am India, based on these events I will do the same. Let's build trust. Let be honest in our dealings.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:44pm
@El Cid hope is Sincerity and strategy has been provided but we know The intentions of Indians which is to weak Pakistan
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 05:53pm
@Rajeev Velagapudi - So you think it's good to take pride in Modi "ignoring" peace plan. Now it won't be just India accusing Pakistan of terrorism rhetoric, Pakistan is turning the tables on India too. The game plan has changed. So, it’s better to come off your high horses and talk – and talk sense!
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 06:08pm
@khanm Interesting hypothesis.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 06:09pm
Globally, big countries dictate terms. It's not the other way. Can't believe Kashmir restricts Pakistan growth. End of it, people in both the countries are denied growth and pprosperity
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 06:21pm
@Rajeev Velagapudi And you say you want peace. That is by dictating your terms. The only thing Indian leaders are interested in these days is to humiliate Pakistan. You cannot have bilateral negotiations when one party has a superiority complex and is hellbent on dictating its terms and insulting the other. I, as a Pakistani, want Pakistan to go out of its way to achieve peace with India, but I don;t see any sincerity from the Indian side.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 06:30pm
@Rajeev Velagapudi ... what NS offer only yesterday, how can both Modi and Sushma can ignore and clear respectively, even without knowing it ?
its a pre-planned reply from India to ignore anything, everything or whatever Pak would offer.... quite rude and unlike peace loving nations.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 07:19pm
@Rizwan the question is not win or loss it's about the right that was given to them.and signed by the Indianame PM in the United Nations. Secondly it is your theory of winning all four wars. Act like a big brother not like a step brother
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 07:20pm
@Anil 'Keeping hoping for another 25 years...'
The annoying thing about the Indians ... you guys show the arrogance which far out weighs your actual status.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 07:21pm
@SRK hhh what a joke...we don't want to talk to ppl who don't want to listen and trying to be uncle Sam. .we are not a weak nation and can give a befitting response
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 07:24pm
Good gesture by Nawaz Shareefs to India - India should also reciprocate in the same gesture it is benefiting for both countries
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 07:32pm
India will not come to the table if we keep trying to shame them in international fora (OIC, UNO etc) with the delivery of so called dossiers containing 'irrefutable proof' about Indian involvement of in Pakistani internals affairs. What is needed is face to face talk with the Indians and talking to Hurriet leaders will not help our case as they have very little following in Indian Kashmir.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 08:08pm
Fact : we don't need to hurry, to get Kashmir issue resolved, why?
\n 1: India is on development path as per current scenario just need need focused on that, K can discussed side by side but don need to resolve it.
\n 2: World or specially critics will say bad. Do need to worry.
\n 3: Need to progress to that level that Indian Kashmir also get rich like switzerland.
\n 4: Then ask UN to tak vote of Kashmir citizens of all side.
Can take 50-200 years but as soon India is comfortable ,no need to hurry, Pak army existence and Indian requirements to buy arms is all depend on that, at last there Is no other way, India can give money.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 08:21pm
It is a smart move. Let's keep Kashmir in the forefront but the main strategy should be development of the country.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 08:48pm
and what is our plan exactly, Mr. PM?
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 08:57pm
@Azhar Its actually "Gandhi". Modi is far a better leader and we love him. Further we will not compromise, we have made our choice.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:27pm
@lafanga See your status first before commenting on others.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:30pm
@Pakistani tujhe salam Please concentrate more hard to give befitting reply. I agree you are excellant
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 09:32pm
UN is not like our Pakistani awam whom our army says "we have killed 10, 20, ....100 suspected terrorists and all the terrorists involved in peshawar attack are eleminated" no proofs, no critics entertained. We failed to understand the meaning of proofs? UN is not an army court in Pakistan where a brigadier declares the punishment and an army cheif approved the hangings. We made a mockery of ourselves at UN.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:03pm
The Pakistani military supports the agenda of keeping tensions live at the border so that their grip on Pakistani politicians and populace is always right. Many in Pakistan would prefer a different relationship with India and the same is true about Indians. Unfortunately neither country benefits without a dispute as it helps concentrate power.the louder someone speaks about the issue the longer they retain power.if media is freely accessible and people are allowed to enquire about their past and other views on what is taught to them for years one would come to the conclusion that they are the same people. Arab obsession and identity dilution has led to this land of distorted history and intolerance. Kashmiris are intellectually very capable and don't share the same problems that plaque Pakistan.They just happen to live in a rough neighborhood where it is difficult to survive independently and not possible to be please both neighbors.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:09pm
I think Pakistani leaders are not in touch with facts and ground realities. Someone should measure iq of NS, he does not understand Hindi, obviously.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:18pm
@Rehan While NS is offerring peace gestures, Gen.Raheel is every day giving 180 degree statements. This would confuse India and they will rightly ask " who is holding the Power"?
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:29pm
@Malik - Its a two way process.. tell your Army to stop supporting the proxies and using them as strategic assests and probably india will follow suit... i am not sure india uses RAW for any activities inside pakistan, but if it does, i am all good for it... we need to have a balance and counter action for every strategies our enemy engages in...
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:29pm
@Shoaib "India would regret if they loose this opportunity to formulate a strategy of dialogue. Time is running fast - mark my words..."
I have marked your words.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:36pm
@M.Saeed - perhaps you need to go and ask your own GEO channel who traced him, talked to his father who accepted everything... living in denial will not serve any purpose... accept what is wrong and move on... stupid comments like yours will only see pakistan in bad light who you are representing..
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:39pm
@George - Live in your own fools paradise.. we are growing at 7.5%.. and inshallah will touch skies... you keep living in your cesspool..
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:40pm
@lafanga - why dont u ask for something similar for baluchistan.. 60000 ppl have been killed/murdered extra judicially too.. how bot that...
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 10:56pm
please understand ground realities in a dispassionate manner. India today is in position of strength - economically, politically, diplomatically and militarily. Economically because they are the fastest growing economy in the world, Politically because they have a govt with absolute majority, diplomatically because its image in global politics (G4, BRICS, UNSC etc.) and militarily because of latest modernization of armed forces and a $50Bn annual budget and 6th largest $ reserve. You can only negotiate any deal in your favour from a position of strength, not from position of weakness. Therefore the hope that India will get back to table on your conditions is only wishful thinking on your part. Sad for Pakistani friends but true. Things may change 20 years down the line, but as of today this is what it is...
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:07pm
@mirza
try doing it..
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:14pm
@M.Saeed how big was Pakistan in 1947 and how big is Pakistan today ,in all terms size,population ,econonomy,socio economic indicators and above all world influence . You still need proof who won ?
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:15pm
@M.Saeed you know deep down, war is not an option, atleast not for Pakistan.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:44pm
@lafanga
And Ban Ki Moon's reply?
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:44pm
@Pakistani tujhe salam Just having nuclear weapons doesnt make you strong when majority of country is poor. Economic strength is more important.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:53pm
@asif I You said it and both sides should appreciate the feelings from a average citizen. However the biggest problem id the proxy war played by state and non-state actors. Once this issue dies down all other issues will be easy to discuss in a peaceful environment. This is easy said than done, and unless this proxy war ends both countries will continue with Pakistan the biggest loser.
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:55pm
@xyz Best of luck to you. Let us wait and see the outcome,
Recommend
0
Oct 04, 2015 11:59pm
India already rejected his peace plan, on what does he still have hopes?
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 12:40am
@nEo same goes for Assam
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 01:47am
By going to the UN and the OIC, the chances of any discussions with India have decreased, at least for the time being. Let there be some cooling off period followed by trust building. This is the only way forward.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 02:02am
What peace plan?
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 02:17am
India needs to mature up before they can be taken steps of what's good for them and the region.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 02:54am
Mr prime minister please learn something from history the attitude India always have and stop
dreaming.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 03:25am
For the love of our country, please focus on developing Pakistan rather than having a dialogue with India on Kashmir. You are dreaming if you think that anything will come out of it.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 03:36am
@Shehzad : Really? It boggles the mind of an outside observer like me! Study history with nationalist blinders off!
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 03:38am
Why not both Prime Ministers deal with issues one by one i.e. most important, first and lesser important later? Why did they backed out from discussing terror first, followed by trade and people to people contact, tourism, making borders free, etc? Kashmir is the least important compared to entire sub-continent.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 03:55am
@Hope ; You pin your "hope" of rebellion in India on Indian Muslims! I wish you could understand that religion does not always top peoples' lives and choices as it does yours!
Think of what issues drive Kashmir Muslims to join Indian armed forces!
*Some ME refugees are converting to Christianity in Europe--why?
Life is larger than just religion and heaven --ultimately!
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 04:04am
@Alla Bux : ALL nations have covert operations in other nations to protect their interests.
So which nation is going to stand up and speak honestly to call India's covert operations out?
Does Pakistan not have covert operations in India? Or do you have any clue about international "relations"?
Ex: USA just pulled its operators from China -- officially! Or just learn how USA created Panama from Columbia for the canal!
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 04:10am
@Honest Liar : PLEASE go ahead and craft your official national policy on those lines--and good luck!
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 05:20am
With CNNIBN video out, India will now discuss Kashmir, even ahead of terrorism !
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 06:10am
@M.Saeed Mr. Saeed, I am glad as somebody from Pakistan acknowledged that Gandhi was a great man.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 06:28am
The only plausible solution is making the LOC the permanent border. But the boys will never accept it and they used the crazy Imran to neuter NS who tried and failed for the second time to make peace. Peace will not happen until the boys are completely under the control of the elected representatives.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 06:29am
Nawaz should not offer any plan until Mdi is there. who is taking indian minds towards hate and extreemism.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 07:13am
India has replied to your PM's message "Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar on Sunday said it was upto India to decide whether it should withdraw or keep forces deployed in Siachen, and does not need advise from Nawaz Sharif"
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 07:30am
India always want peace with pak but it's,pak who attack on India first . operation zebralter , kargil war it's pak forces who first attack on India and even deny any involvement in initial stage.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 08:19am
@Prayandprey ... don't you worry brother. Statements at UN is merely a formality and for emotional folks like you. We know how to deal with covert operations, you will see the result.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 08:31am
@lafanga we call it patriotism which you guys dosent have.....
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 08:34am
@Canada - None of the recipients of "secret" dossier has said any thing to India. Could it be that there was nothing in this "secret"?
Hopefully Pakistan, establishment or non-establishment, will make sure that there is no more "Gurdaspur".
People accepting the principle of using evil will only make the land "brown people" glowing crispy brown. Which side of the border gets more crispy or which side becomes less; both sides will be looser.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 08:51am
@asif - Why cannot Pakistan do what they say - "Will not allow Pakistan to be used by proxies".
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 08:53am
@mirza - Like in 1971, or worse.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 09:06am
Mr Sharif is loosing faith in public , Because Pakistan's people are aware about economy, poverty and India's mars mission too. Its good to talk on peace , but not 24 hour international policies. When a country will be self dependent , all the world will listen you. Try to be self dependent and them we can talk on the issue of neighborhood , but know take care about own family .
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 09:16am
@Modi-Fied Do not lecture us about "Indian power" which ends at Wagah border and an imaginary UNSC seat which India neither has nor will get as long as it is glued down to a local conflict it can not resolve according to her own will. The world understand weakness when it sees it.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 09:23am
@Ali Akhtar(Multan) here in New Delhi, India. people believe in, live and let live. We are least bothered about you fellas, and are focusing on our issues to progress further.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 09:25am
Indians trolling this place like crazy.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 09:27am
@Ajaya K Dutt Funny you bring up 1971 when India used non-state actors back yhen too to create disturbances in East-Pakistan. But this is not 1971. Pakistan is much much stronger today then it has ever been. With two front war being ruled out Pakistan will focus all her military, air, naval power backed up by nuclear weapons to counter any Indian illegal crossing of the international border from the east. There will be no India left after the nuclear clouds clears.
This is why your government and military chickened out last time Indian military was deployed on Pakistan borders and the world saw India for what it was: a local entity, a second grade power, whose power projection ends at Wagah border. This why you will never get a UNSC seat: it will be vetoed down by Pakistan backed China and the 1/3rd nations UN of Muslim countries.
Meanwhile, have fun pretending to a universal power and lobbying Micronesia for a UNSC seat.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 10:09am
@Rehan, You are mistaken, Pakistan is not Nepal or Maldives. Why does india want people here to be prosecuted without any hard evidence while they don't even want to move forward on samjhota express which occured a long before 26/11? Even if we assume that 26/11 is carried out by Pakistanies, why cry about 164 people but do not consider those thousends which got killed due to RAW involvement in FATA, Balochistan, Karachi and specially the military school in Peshawer where 140 children were shot to death by those who get their funds and weapons from India. Pakistan has provided har evidence of indian involvement to Manmohan and now to UNO. Modi may for now be flying high on the American horses but soon will he recognize that without peace with Pakistan, indian dream is going to be more like a nightmare.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 03:19pm
If you see the previous history of Indian behavior to stop dialogue by self invented events to fabricate justifications like 9/11 , again if you expect that Indian will talk to solve ever increasing issues between two countries( which India is creating everyday) then nothing left to make remarks and to expect good from India. They have no intentions for peace with Pakistan..... Better not to live in fools Paradise...
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 10:04pm
@Zak kashmir is first to be resolved. India is sinking because of very bad image and economic drain due to kashmir.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 10:08pm
@lafanga excellent reply to educate Indians.
Recommend
0
Oct 05, 2015 10:59pm
As long as Modi is in power he will see to it the talks will happen only on Indian terms,as Indian economy is the fastest growing one and the rich countries around the world want to make more money out of India they will only toe in Indian side,example UAE,Iran,US,EU etc,so India will be not wasting time with useless
talks,the simple example is How many days Modi stayed in US and what he did Compare it wit NS stay in US,this man Modi is development minded so he will not waste time non productive talks
Recommend
0
Oct 06, 2015 07:00am
@Zak and Pakistan can better afford the economic drain and brand image . It costs Pakistan literally more than 20% of its direct and indirect military expense to defend the Kashmir it has under its control. Not to mention the enormous loss of not being able to trade with the worlds fastest growing economy . The CPEC corridor will dwarf in comparison to a India Pakistan trade potential.sorry to inform you but it's Pakistan that cannot pay for the status quo and war is even costlier.
Recommend
0
Oct 06, 2015 04:34pm
India start Dialogue with whom.?
Recommend
0
Oct 07, 2015 01:04am
Does anyone really listen to UN speeches by various heads of countries and their ministers other than speeches of important countries like US, Russia who have power to alter world politics? Does anyone remember what PM of Pakistan or India told 5 years back? Any visible impact of those speeches? It all eyewash....free trip to US on taxpayer's expense.
Recommend
0
