Witness protection

Published September 10, 2015
Witness protection programmes need planning, commitment and sufficient funds to be truly effective. —Reuters/File
Witness protection programmes need planning, commitment and sufficient funds to be truly effective. —Reuters/File

THE murder of the eyewitness in the Sabeen Mahmud case has once again underscored the urgent need for a witness protection programme.

Ghulam Abbas was working as a part-time driver for Ms Mahmud, the well-known rights activist, and was present at the scene when she was gunned down in Karachi on April 24.

Although it has not yet been confirmed whether the two murders are connected, police have disclosed that during the trial of those accused of Ms Mahmud’s assassination, the slain driver had identified some of the men, a fact that increases the likelihood of precisely such a link.

Know more: Key witness in Sabeen Mahmud murder case shot dead in Karachi

Even if Mr Abbas’s death does not affect the bearing that his testimony will have on the outcome of the legal proceedings, it is certain to intimidate witnesses in other high-profile cases.

Witnesses are vital for successful investigation and prosecution of crime, particularly in countries like Pakistan where the forensic science regime is not very well developed.

The protection of witnesses is therefore a basic requirement to secure their cooperation and give them the confidence to come forward. On the contrary, however, the intimidation of witnesses continues without let or hindrance, perverting the course of justice and allowing many suspects, even those accused of heinous crimes, to go free.

The case of Wali Khan Babar illustrates the gravity of the threat. Six witnesses to the murder of the young journalist in 2011 were themselves eliminated one after another over the course of less than two years.

According to a study carried out by the Punjab police, more than 80pc of terrorism cases resulted in the acquittal of the accused because witnesses either retracted their testimony or refused to appear in court because of intimidation by criminals.

Although the Sindh Assembly passed witness protection legislation in 2013, the law is obviously not being implemented. Witness protection programmes need planning, commitment and sufficient funds to be truly effective. It is a small price to pay, however, for ensuring that hardened criminals are sent behind bars.

Published in Dawn, September 10th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
Updated 19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

The govt ought to take a direct approach comprising convincing communication with the students and Kyrgyz authorities.
Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...