Violence in Sinai

Published July 3, 2015

IT is a measure of Egypt’s political instability that the completion of one year of President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi’s government coincided on Wednesday with one of the biggest attacks by Islamic State militants in the Sinai on the security forces, leading to over 100 deaths. The government declared that the area — Sheikh Zuweid town — was “100pc under control”, but the force used by the security apparatus — F-16 jets and Apache helicopters — only highlighted the militants’ fighting prowess. Moreover, the government’s ‘100pc’ claim appeared dubious when the army declared it would continue the operation until the area had been cleared of “terrorist concentrations”. Even though it was the Islamic State’s Egyptian affiliate which had launched the attack, the government said among those killed were Muslim Brotherhood members, a claim the Brotherhood denied, saying those “murdered” had been doing relief work.

While Egypt had often witnessed terrorist attacks on foreign tourists and the Coptic minority, organised militancy is a new phenomenon and is obviously a reaction to the regime’s unabashed persecution of the opposition, especially of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose government, headed by Mohammed Morsi, Egypt’s first democratically elected president, was removed by the military, followed by bogus trials and the sentencing to death of a number of Brotherhood leaders, including Mr Morsi. In silencing the media and crushing the opposition, Mr Sisi’s aim seems to be to give Egypt ‘political stability’. However, the ferocious clashes in the Sinai and the murder of the chief prosecutor the other day underline the military-led regime’s failure to give peace to the country. Obviously, Mr Sisi hasn’t learnt any lessons from the fate of dictators like Hosni Mubarak, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and Muammar Qadhafi whose systems based on patronage and tyranny collapsed like a house of cards at the first whiff of the Arab spring. However, the dictators mentioned above did give stability — no matter how superficial — for decades, but Mr Sisi appears to be having difficulty in consolidating his hold even in the very beginning.

Published in Dawn, July 3rd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...