Shafqat Husain case

Published March 15, 2015

THE course adopted by the country in executing prisoners on death row is deeply problematic, to say the least. While ending the moratorium on the death penalty in cases involving terrorism caused much consternation among rights groups, lifting the bar in its entirety has opened the floodgates of the miscarriage of justice, particularly given that the flaws in and faults of the justice system are all too evident. This is vividly illustrated in the case of Shafqat Husain, currently incarcerated at the Karachi Central Prison; the warrants for the execution of the 23-year-old have been issued for March 19. However, this may be a travesty of justice; human rights organisations are pointing out that he was around 14 years old at the time of the commission of the crime. Pakistan’s obligation under the international Convention of the Rights of the Child means that the death sentence cannot be handed down to those who were underage at the time the crime was committed. Further, there are grounds to believe that his confession was extracted under torture. On Friday, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan raised these points in calling upon the prime minister and the interior minister to intervene to save Husain’s life. The letter points out that in January, the interior minister “had announced that an inquiry would be conducted by the ministry ... No such inquiry has taken place and Shafqat is now headed for the gallows....”

This case can prove a litmus test for the government’s commitment to the ideals of justice. Husain’s case deserves being considered through a humane lens but the fact is that the matter goes far beyond that. Was the stay on executions a considered move, as a result of which real chances were calculated of bringing militancy under control — even though statistics show that capital punishment is no deterrent to murder? Or was it a knee-jerk reaction to assuage the anger of a nation that has suffered too much? It is the fate of cases such as that of Husain that will decide.

Published in Dawn, March 15th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

‘Hybrid’ talk
22 Jun, 2025

‘Hybrid’ talk

IN the past, while most elected governments would at least publicly bristle at the mention of being partners in ...
Farcical nomination
Updated 22 Jun, 2025

Farcical nomination

Many citizens have expressed dismay and embarrassment over this symbolic capitulation to the US presidency.
Sunken dreams
22 Jun, 2025

Sunken dreams

THE heartrending fate of people escaping conflict, deprivation and instability across the globe is among the...
Tax tussles
Updated 21 Jun, 2025

Tax tussles

Lawmakers should try and fix the broken tax system rather than advocating for new amnesties.
Seniority crisis
21 Jun, 2025

Seniority crisis

THE Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court has determined that there is nothing wrong with Pakistan’s president...
Monsoon readiness
21 Jun, 2025

Monsoon readiness

OUR cities are once again staring down the very real prospect of waterlogged streets and stalled life with PMD’s...