Bashing K-Electric

Published December 21, 2014

THERE is much to hold K-Electric accountable for. But the gratuitous bashing of the power utility and its private-sector management by the power bureaucracy and its line ministry needs to end.

The latest example of trenchant criticism of K-Electric comes from none other than the Minister for Water and Power Khawaja Asif, who in his testimony before a standing committee, reportedly said that the current privatisation of the entity was “against the public interest”, and that the shareholders had a reputation of doubling their money within a few years and moving out. These are highly unfair remarks. If the privatisation was “against the public interest”, would the minister care to clarify how his own government’s scheduled privatisation of power distribution companies will be different? And given that the current shareholders have held management control for more than six years now, how can he argue that their intention is to double their money in a few years and then move out? Does his government intend to prohibit successful bidders from ever selling their shareholding when they privatise the distribution companies next year?

When K-Electric was in government hands, it was vilified for being inefficient and overstaffed and for devouring state subsidies. Using these arguments, the utility was the first to be placed on the chopping block when privatisation of the power sector began in the early 2000s, and now a new set of complaints is being bandied about. Yes, the federal government is owed money by K-Electric, but aren’t there payments owed to the utility by the government as well? Yes, K-Electric buys electricity from the national grid, but why shouldn’t it? Yes, there are inefficiencies and losses, but K-Electric’s record of reducing these is so far better than that of its counterparts in Punjab. Khawaja Asif should realise that he is responsible for the power sector of the entire country, and not just one province. He should understand that Karachi, as part of the country, does not deserve such one-sided censure.

Published in Dawn, December 21st, 2014

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...