US backs democracy, peaceful protests

Published August 15, 2014
US State Department spokesperson Marie Harf. — Photo by AFP
US State Department spokesperson Marie Harf. — Photo by AFP

WASHINGTON: The United States “stands strongly” in favour of an elected government in Pakistan but also backs people’s right to assemble peacefully, says the US State Department.

At a news briefing in Washington, the department’s spokesperson Marie Harf noted that “some marches” were being held in Pakistan on the Independence Day but refused to get involved in a discussion over the issues involved.

“We don’t have any position on the planned marches,” said the US official when asked to comment on the marchers’ claim that the present government came to power through rigged elections and should step down.

But “we obviously, stand strongly in favour of a democratically-elected civilian government, [and] also the position of individual rights, including people to assemble peacefully,” she added.

Responding to a question about US Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent visit to India, Ms Harf said that Kashmir “probably” was among the issues discussed in his meetings with Indian officials and promised to give more details later.

India refuses to discuss Kashmir with other nations, saying that this was an issue that it prefers to discuss directly with Pakistan.

Reminded that Pakistan has rejected Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s allegation that it was running a proxy war in Kashmir, Ms Harf said: “We’ve seen these comments. We continue to encourage dialogue between India and Pakistan, and we would welcome any and all positive steps that the two sides could take.”

Pakistan has said that India’s allegations go against the spirit of recent moves towards resumption of dialogue between the two countries and urged India to avoid mud-slinging.

When a journalist observed that India and Pakistan were celebrating their independence this week with renewed tensions on the border, the US official urged both nations to take “all positive steps” that would “strengthen and deepen their dialogue and cooperation”.

Published in Dawn, August 15th, 2014

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...