Obama and Obamacare

Published
5

While the decision of the House of Representatives to sue President Barack Obama may be unprecedented, it is hardly surprising.

Four decades have passed, but Watergate is still fresh in the public memory. Richard Nixon did not believe he had committed any wrong. By any standards a great man, Nixon ‘vindicated’ himself after he was no more in the White House by making an extraordinary comeback as a writer and freelance diplomat. Bill Clinton had a charisma of his own.

If Nixon made history by effecting a rapprochement with China — Henry Kissinger flew to Beijing from Nathiagali — Mr Clinton’s tour de force was the ‘peace of the brave’ that saw Yasser Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin shake hands on a White House lawn in 1993.

But then came Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, and the Republicans began to sharpen their knives. Accused of perjury and obstructing justice, Mr Clinton was lucky to survive impeachment in the Senate because of lack of a two-thirds majority.

Several years later, it is the Republicans again who want to go after a Democrat president. Understandably, the Democrats have reacted angrily, with Nancy Pelosi, a former House speaker, calling the move “sickening”.

President Obama has been equally derisive about the proposed lawsuit, saying that instead of suing him for doing his job, Congressmen should do theirs.

It is noteworthy that the move to sue the president concerns Mr Obama’s health reforms, or Obamacare, which have hurt America’s powerful medical insurance lobby.

And yet, despite the politics, one cannot but admire the strength of America’s constitutional institutions. The two parties may take bipartisan rivalry to absurd limits, but as history from the ’70s to the 21st century shows, it is the American people’s commitment to democracy that weathered the crises.

Watergate and the Lewinsky scandal rocked the US, but they did not derail or weaken democracy. Unfortunately, the point to note is also the unmistakable decline in the quality of US politics. It is this aspect that should be cause for concern.

Published in Dawn, August 2nd, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...