Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience



Your Name:

Recipient Email:

LAHORE: Nadra has found discrepancies in the election record of NA-118, Lahore, says a report submitted to an election tribunal hearing a petition that demands verification of votes polled in the national assembly constituency.

PTI's Hamid Zaman, who stood runner-up, filed the petition alleging PML-N's Riaz Malik committed rigging in the general polls. The tribunal had ordered Nadra to verify ballots with thumb impressions of the voters.

The report says the authority was provided the record of 68 polling stations by the Election Commission. It says only 15,835 out of total 46,118 polled votes at these polling stations were found correct in terms of thumb impressions of the voters. Nadra found counterfoils of 4,043 votes with invalid CNIC numbers and 142 votes were cast by unregistered voters. It says thumb impressions of voters were not found on 272 counterfoils.

During Monday's hearing, the defence counsel asked the tribunal to seal the report submitted by Nadra avoiding its reporting by the media. The tribunal handed over a copy of the report to petitioner's counsel accepting his argument that the report was not a classified document. The tribunal adjourned hearing till June 16.

Published in Dawn, June 10th, 2014

Comments (4) Closed

Mustafa Jun 10, 2014 01:10pm

We need to fix the Election Commission before we can fix the elections.

Dystopia Jun 10, 2014 03:39pm

Waiting for responses from the PMLN supporters to defend the indefensible.

Hassan Jun 10, 2014 04:10pm

Oh my my... the mandate is evaporating in thin air

Farrukh Seer Jun 11, 2014 06:53am

Another NADRA report which confirms that there was nothing wrong with election results, except that the magnetic ink was not of the right quality. Out of over 15000 thump impressions deciphered, none was invalid. The discrepancies in CNIC numbers is the expected result of election staff working under stressful conditions for long hours and therefore making errors in noting CNIC numbers.