KARACHI: The State Bank on Monday issued fresh instructions for enhancing security features in cheques while it amended some previous guidelines.

“For paper security, banks are required to ensure that all cheques contain printer’s logo or name as a watermark,” said the SBP circular. The watermark can be single or multi tone.

However, it must be ensured that Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) readability is not adversely affected by such watermarks.

Further, the paper used for cheques must contain at least one Invisible Ultraviolet (UV) security feature, such as UV fibres, UV Hi-Lites or any other.”

“At least the MICR code line shall be impact printed using the bleed through technology while the usage of bleed through technology on any other field of the cheque is optional for banks. It must be ensured that bleed through feature in the MICR code line or any other place is not laser printed,” said the circular.

Follow Dawn Business on X, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Chinese diplomacy
Updated 14 Mar, 2026

Chinese diplomacy

THERE are signs that China is taking a more active role in trying to resolve the issue of cross-border terrorism...
Fragile gains at risk
14 Mar, 2026

Fragile gains at risk

PAKISTAN is confronting an external shock stemming from the US-Israel war on Iran that few of the other affected...
Kidney disease
14 Mar, 2026

Kidney disease

ON World Kidney Day this past Thursday, the Pakistan Medical Association raised the alarm on Pakistan’s...
Delicate balance
Updated 13 Mar, 2026

Delicate balance

PAKISTAN has to maintain a delicate balance where the geopolitics of the US-Israeli aggression against Iran are...
Soaring costs
13 Mar, 2026

Soaring costs

FOR millions of households already grappling with Ramazan inflation, the sharp increase in petrol and diesel prices...
Perilous lines
13 Mar, 2026

Perilous lines

THE law minister’s veiled warning to the media to “exercise caution” and not cross “red lines” while...